They have to keep it separate in their mind. Issue a ruling. This runs about 2 1 2 hours. Cooperate to proceed as if i wasnt here for the first argument so let me focus on whats different about texas. One thing thats different abtexas is its definition of social media platforms excludes website. We can put the gmail issue to one side when talk about texas. It also excludes websites primarily focused on news, sports and entertainment. In the First Amendment business we call that contentbased discrimination. Thats one of the reasons this statute is unconstitutional. The other thing thats different is that in some respects this statute operates more simply because it forebids my clines from engaging in viewpoint discrimination. Were used to thinking that viewpoint discrimination is a bad thing and the government shouldnt do it. And of course when governments do it it is a bad thing. When editors of speakers engage in viewpoint discrimination that is their First Amendment right. It is also
Laws. What gives you the authority to tell the u. S. Border patrol what to do . This land were on right now was used by the federal government to further illegal activity. And i want to put a stop to it. There were more than 3,000 book bans in Public Schools last year. 1,000 more than the year before. We went to one conservative southern town to hear how theyre turning the page. Parents have the right to determine what their children are taught and what theyre allowed to read. But when were having a problem with is parents that want to determine what other parents rights are for their children to read what they want. Elon musk and jeff bezos, two of the richest men in the world, are in a race to help nasa put astronauts back on the moon and then on to mars. And liftoff of artemis i. Its not science fiction, but its also not easy. And thats our story tonight. Im lesley stahl. Ill bill whittaker. Im anderson cooper. Im sharyn alfonsi. Im jon wertheim. Im cecilia vega. Im scott pelley. Th
Hello, im Chris Williamson and youre watching palestine declassified. Were the only weekly tv show thats dedicated to investigate. And exposing the Israeli Regimes global war against solidarity with the illegally occupied people of palestine. In this weeks show well be diggin into the activities of the rightwing polemicist Douglas Murray whos an apologist for the gaza genocide and closely linked to the Islamophobic Henry Jackson society think tank. Murray was intending to raise funds for zinist soldiers perpetrating the gaza in genocide until his plans came un stuck thanks to a boycot by ordinary shopfloor workers as latif abu chakra will explain in. This report. Veteran islamophobe Douglas Murray failed in his attempt to publicly raise money for Israeli Soldiers in london. Following his time embedded with the Israeli Occupation forces in ghazza, mari returned to london, hoping he could contribute to the genocide effort. The event that Douglas Murray was supposed to hold hit a stumblin
Filled with bad belts, corrupt and biased workers. Unjustly flipping the white house to the democratic party. But i have another take which quite possibly is impervious to challenge. Imagine someone in your life lying to your face multiple times that is what joe did. Joe biden just told the truth about his past when he was asked his defeat wouldve been virtually guaranteed in here is what i mean. Thanks to recent revelations two plus years later we are fighting about the allegations of his family business, were flat out blatant conflicts of National Interest altered list talk about the first major life the infamous laptop. I want to stay on the issue of race we. There are 50 former National Intelligence folks. Who said what he is accusing me up as a russian plants. They have said this as all five former heads of the cia both parties say what he is saying is a bunch of garbage. You mean the laptop is now a russia, russia, russia hoax . 360 realize how nutty that is joe looking into the
Cooperateo proceed as if i wasnt here for the first argument so let me focus on whats dferent about texas. One thing thats different abxas is its definition of social media platforms excludes website. Wean put the gmail issue to one side when lkbout texas. It also excludes websitesor and. In the First Amendmentusess we call that contentbased discrimination. Thatsnef the reasons this statute is unconstitutional. The other thg thats different is that iso respects this statute operates more simply because it f clines from engaging iviewpoint discrimination. Were edo thinking that viewpointiscrimination is a bad thing and the government shouldnt do it. Do it it is a bad thing. When editors of speakers enga in viewpoint discrimination that is their first amendntight. It is also absolutely vital to the operation of these websites because if you have to be viewpot neutral that means suicideyou have materials that prevention you also haveo ve materials that advocate suicide promotion. Or if yo