N evidence points direc their way. All o ts happening tons the remasf thosen board that ple areinally beginning jo. Tsohats where we start with abcs chief foreign corrpondent terryoran at the now. St fm investigors right e reporter fally after four days, the professionals owed up today a threeman Forensics Team from the netherlands, joined by international monitors still suounded by armed and masked rels but bringing a bit of order to the chaos here. The air crash investigators have just arrived at one of the major impact sites scattered tough thesfields. Theyre taking pictures, walking around, just getting a sense of what they can learn here. Ahead, a daunting searching for signs of shrapnel or explosive residue or telltale damage, scattered across a 13squaremile site thats already been compromised. Including rebels rummaging rough the personal belongings of victims last week. Earlier, the dutch team examining the bodies, 289 of the 298 on board flight 17 now recovered, stored in refr
And ocourse Many National parks are still shut. But lots of noneential staff are also down and you had that to hose that a paid to car brush and federal land and this is really turning into a proverbial zoo. But it gets worse. Members of the house actually have to pick up and clean teir own houses. How terrible. W, its hard to blieve. How about omeone to put this into perspective. My next guest. Mercedes, i have to tel you that there is a clock in haway, everyone walks past it, no one decides to wind it up. That tells usthat speaks volumes about why washington s messed. I was actlly kind of shocked. The personnel clok wander in the capital. Cant we outsource the position . [laughter] i think when you start looking at the different c component for example my k might be uet about the panda cam been turned off, but it puts into persive how outadollars being spt. So much pressure being put out there by the white house. And in some ways, again, its e reasooe are having a problem is because
This is because we dont receive taxes from ucsf. And unfortunately we have a significant amount of work that we need to do, whether it be infrastructure at mission bay, whether it be Transportation Needs at mission bay, whether it be housing in mission bay and i do realize there are limits to where this funding can go. But i just think that they should be paying the entire amount up froth or paying the entire amount over the duration of the 30 years. I dont see why it should be discounted because the city is not collecting property taxes in any other instance from ucsf and in this particular case our one shot, our one chance at collecting some level of significant revenue is basically turned into a deal. I think they should pay the full amount and thats the reason why because there are no guarantees that theyll move out of the space. And the fact that thats even introduced in any way to make an argument is just i dont support that argument because we cant force them to do that. I think
Good afternoon, supervisors. Bruce [speaker not understood], city ask county surveyor. I think most of you have seen the center here today, but the summation is this on december 4th, 2013 we received two subdivision applications from Neighboring Properties on Mission Street at the intersection with third. First subdivision applications of fourunit air space parcel map proposed to divide assessors block 3 76, [speaker not understood], 738 Mission Street. This property currently houses he the contemporary Jewish Museum and the jesse squared garage. Subdivision would split lot 277 into four parcels. Parcel a would be a portion lying below ground for an existing garage. Parcel b would be the air space above the existing garage. Parcel c would be the space above the Jewish Museum and parcel d would be the air space below the Jewish Museum. The subdivision is necessary to convey parcel a and b to the developer who submitted the second ably indication. Second application would be project 797
Approve these parcel maps would also be inadequate. Theyre kind of an ipso facto, if it didnt work there, it wont work here. Now, the Planning Department assumes this is a third issue that your time period after certification by the eir, the only issue is whether there is new information, changed circumstances, or a change in the project that would require a subsequent or supplemental eir. And i disagree with that. Even if its true, i think there is such new information and ill get to that. I do disagree with that. I think this board has an opportunity to reconsider the adequacy of this eir under ceqa at this time because this approval involves a vesting tentative map which could have been approval last summer with the other ones. For whatever reason the project sponsor decided to delay it. And a vesting map that grants fundamental rights to develop. So, this eir should be judged on its own merits at this time. Rather than simply looking through the lens as section 21 16 of ceqa looks