I did review the 311 notice and the plans that were provided by the neighbor. It was clear that the notice itself was the new notice from 2017. It clearly stated it was going to four stories. The plans that they have are the old plans from 2013, 2014. I have no way of knowing if those are the plans that were included with that notice last year because those plans were only dated as to when they were, you know, drawn by the designer. Not when they were mailed out or included in the 311 packet. So i cant corroborate that is the those are the actual plans that were sent with that 311 notice, whether thats the truth or not. All i do know that issue was not raised in the appeal. It was not raised in a brief. It has not been raised by any neighbors to our knowledge to either the project sponsor or the department staff. That includes potentially being raised by the neighbor to the north who originally dred the project and chose not to dr it based on revised plans. In order to get anymore info
[gavel] welcome to the january 31, 2018 meeting of the San Francisco board of appeals. The presiding officer this evening is board president hon darryl honda joined by frank fung, commissioner lazarus, and commission eer wilson and commissioner swig. We have the attorney and the boards legal assistant, and i am cynthia goldstein. We will be joined shortly by Scott Sanchez who is the Zoning Administrator who will be representing the Planning Department and the Planning Commission. The board requests you turn off cell phones and Electronic Devices and carry on conversations in the hallway. The rule of presentation is as follows. There are 7 minutes to present the case and 3 minutes for rebuttal. People affiliated with the parties must include the comments within the seven or three minute periods. Members not affiliated have 3 minutes to address the board but no eare rebuttal. We ask that you provide us a speaker card or Business Card if you are willing so that board staff can have the ac
Keeping hard copies of jobs that go out in terms how long they keep those physical documents. I havent had a chance to request that. Because it appears that the transmittal of information from the Planning Department to repo mill were correct. That is the only kind of area that we havent been able to explore thoroughly yet. I want to follow up the 3 11 notice has a description that referenced a four story project. It definitely referenced the newer plans. They are not what the old plans were, as mentioned. Thank you. Commissioners the matter is submitted. Time is over. I will start. One, it is really difficult to hear a case just orally, and that is why briefs are submitted and had certain questions been asked maybe some of those could have been answered here this evening. Other than that, i feel that this is a conforming project. It has gone on a long time there. Are no exemptions, no rare variances required. I feel a reason to deny the appeal and accept the project as it is. So if th
And the Settlement Agreement advances our policy goals around stationless bike share as well and were particularly excite ford the potential of ebikes. And theres different operators. Jump was the first operator that was eligible for a permit under our program. Jump submitted its initial application in july of 201 prior to any other company. It developed as the first and only company to fulfill all the permit requirements with the november 2017 submittals. One requirement was the data sharing requirement. Thats something we heard a lot of reluctance from from other companies and jump was the first to operate ebike. Was there a set of criteria about what the sfmta was looking for . Did it say in october when these got ahead of Transportation Technologies did you say to the potential world of stationless bike sharing companies, we are looking for e bikes. That is a criteria. Were looking for data sharing as a criteria. If you do not have these youll be considered incomplete. Yes. We deve
Is carl a for the department of public works and the department of Public Works Bureau of street use and mapping i expect well be joined by Scott Sanchez for the Planning Department and Planning Commission and joe duffy that represents the department of building inspection mr. Pacheco please go over the boards meeting guidelines and the phones and other Electronic Devices are prohibited. Out in the hallway. People affiliated with these parties must conclude their comments within 7 minutes, participants not affiliated have up to 3 minutes no rebuttal. To assist the board in the accurate preparation of the Business Card to the clerk. Speaker cards and pens are available on the left side of the podium. The board welcomes your comments. There are Customer Satisfaction forms available. If you have a question about the schedule, speak to the staff after the meeting or call the board office tomorrow mroemdz 78. Dvds are available to purchase directly from sfgovtv. Thank you for your attention