The street facade. I modifying prefer the 6th day design. I still had an email and my comment was mr. Van gogh designed this in the city and the columns you see on the outside of the building are fake and they dont connect to the ground even. The idea those two particular columns on either end dont support anyone is not visible only to people who know it is not connected. The visually the pattern is much more in keeping with the pattern in this district there was a lot of conversation in the staff report it never came out here about the base. Some idea of base thats been added and you know, i had a few comments about it because in the staff report it created the kind of two part come accusation its typical in the district. Again Walking Around the district the base is a one story or two story element its not a 18 inch on one side and kind of encompass into the ground on the other so looking at the post street facade it doesnt seem any different than before. When i heard about a base i
Dog no one it looking at that it fits in so well were looking at the frame and glass facade. So i dont think we should be swayed by conversation of the one sixth of the site is the piece that matters and its been brought out by a number of the speakers. Im concerned about the stockton side theres no change there and the question about the variance thats required. Ive sought variances on issues and theres been hardships that are there and obviously designing a building theres no hardship there thats not our charge so im not sure how it gets resolved. I dont have a major concern but its again only one building i could find in the desire district that doesnt have any blank walls thats on the macys building on farrell that has blank walls but thats not a shining i didnt example of walls in our district. The materials you know the bar building is great. I think to say you cant have cast stone that looks like indiana wall stone, of course, you can use stone that looks like stone thats approp
That would, you know, makeorbreak the building i think the stepping of the mask down in essence the whole bar issue is the tail wagging the dog no one it looking at that it fits in so well were looking at the frame and glass facade. So i dont think we should be swayed by conversation of the one sixth of the site is the piece that matters and its been brought out by a number of the speakers. Im concerned about the stockton side theres no change there and the question about the variance thats required. Ive sought variances on issues and theres been hardships that are there and obviously designing a building theres no hardship there thats not our charge so im not sure how it gets resolved. I dont have a major concern but its again only one building i could find in the desire district that doesnt have any blank walls thats on the macys building on farrell that has blank walls but thats not a shining i didnt example of walls in our district. The materials you know the bar building is great.
Role significantly enough to change the scale. We could i guess debate whether it brings it down to the pedestrian level or not thats up for debate. I expressed a concern theres no corn on this building it would be in the middle of the block and the design is the same. The height of the building and the staff analysis says it matches the adjacent building bus its only the bar building it matches. I continue to have concern about the height. The other two buildings at least one of them the nicky building open the one corn and the other digitally their 7 to the stories so this corner drops down especially theres no demarco in this design. The base as commissioner pearlman mentioned is still weak. Its a more creative solution than the one we saw previously. Commissioner. I had a question about the dates i dont know how this was dealt with but on the west side the sidewalks go down so youve got a a little bit of a well, how was that dealt with before. Previously in front of the of the stor
Or two story element its not a 18 inch on one side and kind of encompass into the ground on the other so looking at the post street facade it doesnt seem any different than before. When i heard about a base i was encouraged that would create something at least that sense that the building was sitting on something but dont see how thats been executed in a way that it relates to the district. The heights one thing its a question i walked around union jury and saw the shortest building is 3 steroids not 4 stories its four stories. Where. On post and pile the old disney. But implicit i dont see the scale as being a specific issue that would, you know, makeorbreak the building i think the stepping of the mask down in essence the whole bar issue is the tail wagging the dog no one it looking at that it fits in so well were looking at the frame and glass facade. So i dont think we should be swayed by conversation of the one sixth of the site is the piece that matters and its been brought out b