Wt is the full extent cleared away. Chuck rosenberg. Of the democrats prior senator mccains former coordination with the whistleblower, and who else did colleague, jeff flake, retired the whistleblower coordinate senator from arizona, surmised this effort with . That if a secret impeachment second, what is the full extent vote were held, 3035 of the of ukraines Election Meddling Senate republican members would against the Trump Campaign . Vote to impeach. And i thought how sad, how sad, and third, why did burisma hire that it takes a secret vote to hunter biden, and what did he do for them, and did his position make a courageous vote. Affect any u. S. Government actions under the obama it should be 3035 if they administration . These questions will remain believe thats the right thing to do. I know im sounding naive, but i outstanding because republicans were denied the right to call witnesses that know these remember being saddened by that. I feel the same way. Answers. What we will w
defense attorney. ferocious trial advocate. great cross examiner. i think it s a great choice. drew, his current lead counsel down there is also an outstanding attorney. i don t know what the issue was. he picked somebody who is outstanding and kind of a real fighter in the trump mold. laura: mike, the motorcade is arriving right at the courthouse and they are going through the gates at this moment. and there will be some perfunctory details they will have to get to. i wonder if the president will have to go through the magnetometer i guess he will with the secret service. this the whole thing is ridiculous. the pictures we are seeing. this has never happened in the history of the united states. a presidential motorcade going to take former president to be processed, booked, and the left hopes humiliated but i think the country is going to have something to say about this. mike? yeah. this is outrageous. here we have another democrat
defense attorney. ferocious trial advocate. great cross examiner. i think it s a great choice. drew, his current lead counsel down there is also an outstanding attorney. i don t know what the issue was. he picked somebody who is outstanding and kind of a real fighter in the trump mold. laura: mike, the motorcade is arriving right at the courthouse and they are going through the gates at this moment. and there will be some perfunctory details they will have to get to. i wonder if the president will have to go through the magnetometer i guess he will with the secret service. this the whole thing is ridiculous. the pictures we are seeing. this has never happened in the history of the united states. a presidential motorcade going to take former president to be processed, booked, and the left hopes humiliated but i think the country is going to have something to say about this. mike? yeah. this is outrageous. here we have another democrat
should he have hung up on the son, hunter, when he put him on the line? yeah, but, you know, that s a really tough time. so what it actually tells me not that joe biden was, you know, under stress the, what it tells me is even though beau was dying, hunter and joe biden are still determined to make munch in that s how how big their greed is, that s what they re focused on. let s get on the call, let s make sure hunter make makes money instead of paying attention to beau who s dying of cancer. by the way, they use beau, anytime they re in trouble, they use beau to cover up. will: so i asked for this next part, i think this is fascinating. pete: this is the one that we jumped to previously. will: by accident. but, so goldman s role in this, i think, is fascinating. he creates this illusion of access thing, and then he walks down this path where the truth comes out unknowingly. he s like the best cross-examiner, although he doesn t know he s. s cross-examining devon
cover of employee number, et cetera. because part of what is being alleged here is that these three defendants, now donald trump, walt nauta, and carlos de la vera acted in a way to try to persuade an additional employee to act. talking about trump employee number four to delete that as part ofconsciousness of guilt. those are the potentially so-called witnesses who could give the testimony and credibility. no case of this magnitude would hinge on one particular witness or one statement because the risk is always they could essentially either recant, they could have some credibility issue where they could be undermined by a savvy cross examiner to suggest that this is not the person to assign all the credence to and credibility, so there has to be more corroboration. and one of the questions that s looming here is you ve end endeavored to have this footage deleted. was it indeed? was there a moment where jack smith or counsel have been able to view the different footage