cover of employee number, et cetera. because part of what is being alleged here is that these three defendants, now donald trump, walt nauta, and carlos de la vera acted in a way to try to persuade an additional employee to act. talking about trump employee number four to delete that as part ofconsciousness of guilt. those are the potentially so-called witnesses who could give the testimony and credibility. no case of this magnitude would hinge on one particular witness or one statement because the risk is always they could essentially either recant, they could have some credibility issue where they could be undermined by a savvy cross examiner to suggest that this is not the person to assign all the credence to and credibility, so there has to be more corroboration. and one of the questions that s looming here is you ve end endeavored to have this footage deleted. was it indeed? was there a moment where jack smith or counsel have been able to view the different footage