Personal bias. I was disappointed no doubt about it. However, he relied on the law. And the inputs which are the charges and the indictment which he could not control, dictated his output. I think that it was an inappropriate charge from the start there were many other officers there and there could have been charges that would have implicated the other officers who did set this chain of events which caused death, into motion. Which is exactly how and why mr. Brelo was acquitted. So joey one thing that the judge pointed out, is that causation was a real problem in this case. And it appears that thats one of the things that that led to his decision of not guilty on both counts. He did indeed joe. You know its interesting, though whenever a judge acts as a finder of fact in addition to a concluder of law, the judge of course is placed in a position as a jury would be placed in. Its interesting because the judge certainly could have gone another route had he credited expert testimony. And
Uvalde 2 years later: Where the investigation stands
go.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from go.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Uvalde 2 years later: Where the investigation stands – KTBB News, Weather, Talk
ktbb.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from ktbb.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.