means before day ten. i have no knowledge as to whether this occurred in this case or not. this confirms that there were indeed communications issues between horizon and the data centre at this time. however, it should have had no impact on data recorded locally within the branch, provided all operational processes are followed correctly. all historical data should have been sent back to the branch from the data centre as normal. i have not had the opportunity to examine the detailed logs from the period to see whether there were any issues or any justification in the claim that this resulted in a apparent system losses of £3000, as claimed. those final words in that final sentence, i have not had the opportunity to examine the detailed logs, do you consider that to be a fair and accurate summary of the position we have seen in those e mails? it accurate summary of the position we have seen in those e-mails?- have seen in those e-mails? it looks that wa , have seen in thos
owe i’ over the ever the page, i limited. if we go over the page, i am going to read some of that statement. he says, i ve been asked to provide a statement in the case of grant allen. i understand the integrity of the system has been questioned and this report provides some general information. i know that in the summary of facts, it is stated that during the period of relocation in march 2010, mr allen believed that a £3000 discrepancy was due to horizon not sending out data. non polling. i ve been shown extracts from the horizon non polled reports from the eighth to the 17th of march which show that the winsford branch was included in the report for 12 days up to and including the 17th of march. this in itself is unusual, as if a branch appears on the non polled report for more than a few days, an attempt is made to retrieve the data by other
limited. if we go over the page, i am going to read some of that statement. he says, i ve been asked to provide a statement in the case of grant allen. i understand the integrity of the system has been questioned and this report provides some general information. i know that in the summary of facts, it is stated that during the period of relocation in march 2010, mr allen believed that a £3000 discrepancy was due to horizon not sending out data. non polling. i ve been shown extracts from the horizon non polled reports from the eighth to the 17th of march which show that the winsford branch was included in the report for 12 days up to and including the 17th of march. this in itself is unusual, as if a branch appears on the non polled report for more than a few days, an attempt is made to retrieve the data by other