santos. quoting from the congressman s statement, with the ongoing attention surrounding my personal and campaign financial investigations i have submitted a request to speaker mccarthy i be temporarily recused of committee assignments until i am cleared. he has been disowned by his own republican leadership for lying to them. he says he expects to be fully cleared. why you might ask does he think that? because, and these are his own words, i have nothing to hide. it wasn t even true when he said it. when asked which network he had done an interview with he refused to say. it was oan. he promised the interview would be fun and comprehensive. fun, we will leave it up to you. but in the 12-minute clip the network posted late today the congressman who lied about his religion, education, ancestors and career, criminal charges, athletic accomplishments and more was far from comprehensive. in those 12 minutes released he wasn t asked about specific lies and admitted none of that
delegation. he says that he expects to be fully cleared. why you might ask, does he think that? because these are his own words today, quote, i have nothing to hide. there was not even true when he said, it because when asked which network he had just done an interview with, he refused to say. it was oan. he did have at least one thing to hide today. he also promised that the interview would be quote, fun and comprehensive. fun, you will leave that up to him. a 12 second clip posted today, lying about his religion, education, and ancestors, and his career, criminal charges, athletic accomplishments, and more, it was far from comprehensive. those 12 minutes that were released, he was not asked about specific lies, and mentioned none of that comprehensive list of things that he s lied about. there is more than hasn t been released, we will see. what was released, santos seem to suggest that he had already said enough. i have made my sincere apology multiple times. i ve said t
to decide what he said on the tape. that is the best evidence? yes, sir. the defense got the same witness to tell the jury that the murder weapon that killed paul murdaugh was not collected from the gunroom at the house and the ammunition was not a match either. neither fired the shots that killed paul, correct? i do not have the lab report in front of me. have you ever found the murder weapons? not that i am aware of, sir. you did not find any similar ammunition june 8th or any time after that? i did not, sir. alec s second cousin and a captain with the department of natural resources testified for the state. he told the injury he built ar style rifles for alec murdaugh, the same type of rifle the prosecution says was used at the
the legal battle in court. according to your testimony he said i did him so bad. that is what i understood him to say, yes, sir. alec murdaugh s defense lawyer cross-examining a witness for the prosecution. the goal is to clear up what he heard or thought he heard alec murdaugh say that seemed to sound like a confession. when alec was interviewed just a few days after his wife and son were murdered he said this. it was just so bad. i did him so bad. reporter: the witness had told the court he thought alec said i did him so bad. the defense suggested alec said they did him so bad. did you consider that as a confession on june 10th? it is something we were
definitely going to follow up on. why didn t you ask him then and there? why didn t you ask him what you mean by that alec? it was early in the investigation. what were the things going through your mind when you heard or misheard i did him so bad. you were like i wasn t a good dad? i spoiled him or i killed him? what was going through your mental note? there is a mental note it is definitely something we need to follow up on. reporter: the defense replayed the part of the interview at regular speed and slowed it down to a third of the speed and play it again. we would like to to play it again. it is just so bad. they did him so bad. you hear they then? no, sir, i did not. you would agree the jury gets