If. O, say can you see by the dawns early light what so proudly we hailed at the twilights last gleaming . Whose broad stripes and bright stars through the Peril Ous Fight oer the ramparts we watched were so glal antly gallantly streaming. And the rockets red glare, the bombs bursting in air gave proof through the night that our flag was still there. O, say does that starspangled banner yet wave oer the land of the free and the Home Of The Brave if. Pete we may have ended with a father or grandfather with two babies, but today is mothers day. It is sunday, may 12th, year of our lord 2024, and i hope all the mothers out there know how much we love them, because we all have a mother. And happy mothers day to you. Rachel you said times 29 . 35. [laughter] pete by the end of the show. Charlie, great to have you. Wills slacking off charlie yeah, see how bad i screw it up. Pete you with wont,. Charlie not as bad as he does [laughter] pete he yous up screws up monstrously on sundays. Charlie
fighting his extradition to the us. a uk court ruled last month that he could appeal this decision after mr assange argued that he would not receive a fair trial. now he s agreed a plea deal, and legal documents show that mr assange is set to appear before a court in a us territory in the pacific ocean before an expected return to his home nation australia. paul hawkins has more. wikileaks published this clip on social media showing its founder flying published this clip on social media showing its founderflying out published this clip on social media showing its founder flying out of the country late on monday afternoon. it said it spent 9000 2/9000 days in prison for publishing what he called ground breaking stories of corruption and human rights abuses in this stories of corruption and human rights abuses i stories of corruption and human rights abuses in this period of our lives, i rights abuses in this period of our lives. i am rights abuses in this period of our live
right? because this what we saw on that videotape very much appears to be a violation of georgia criminal law because there is a crime of, one, suborning perjury. frankly, poll workers being told a lie about voter fraud, that is in and of itself a crime. but also intimidating poll workers, harassing poll workers falls under the criminal code. one of the reasons why ahmaud arbery s case finally saw some justice is because people organized and made noise about the fact that law enforcement was not taking action against his killers. this is the same situation in the context of poll worker intimidation. we have to also have on the ground organizing that identifies where and how the apparatus of government should be doing its job and there s a real question to me in this reporting and i don t know the facts of whether that s happening. and just one other point because
conspiracy. in the second volume the report describes the results and analysis of our obstruction of justice investigation. involving the president. mueller says specifically he didn t find enough evidence to move forward. this is what phil was talking about. to move forward with a crime of is that the same of saying obstruction didn t occur? not at all. in fact, when you read the mueller report carefully. this is the type of thing that s important that mueller come out and say in his own words. whether before congress or otherwise. that mueller actually goes out of his way in the report to make clear that he felt obstructed in certain parts of his investigation that he was never able to get to the bottom of it. most famously the question of paul manafort handing over polling date to konstantin
the first one, manafort, is talking to his buddies wiies ab what they want with the soviet and united states. we know that the trump team, made sure that the platform was changed in a way that was better for the russian perspective. how troubling is that to you? it s really troubling. because, potentially, it means that there was a policy shift. by a major party nominee and the question was, i think, is whether or not that is done in exchange for something of value. legally that is what the issue is. whether or not there s a quid pro quo, we don t have for it to be a crime. for it to be a crime of. my bar is never a crime. it s just about what was wrong, what should you not have done. and who knew. but i hear you about it being a felony. second piece of coincidence here. the places that much of the