it a y dna basically the y chromosome should eliminate the background dna information from the female victim. judge jeanine: what do you think has got to be done here, guys. first of all, urn, the police are going to have to go back and do a lot of interviewing. the backgrounds of these young ladies. who they knew and who was friendly to them. this looks like to me a carefully methodical execution. sob sur veiled the place and knew when they were going to do this and knew they had to get rid of the evidence. not everyone know thousands do that. they have to take a good look at what they already looked at. judge jeanine: and that is what they are going to do. joey hit the nail about the dna banks. even in new york the most minimal crime you jumped the turn style and now have to give an sample of your dna. it may be two, four years where it is a a match.
thomas. thank you both for being here and words can t adequately express the condolences that we want to offer to you and i can t imagine what you have been through. you guys doing okay? yeah, thank you very much for acknowledging it that it continues on. judge jeanine: well, and it is a shame. your daughters were murdered in 1991. it is now 2012. and as of now you the status of the case is that it hasn t been solved although two guys have been convicted and they are out now and they are out walking. do you believe that those two guys springsteen and scott committed the crime? yes. absolutely. we dual i m pretty sure. judge jeanine: why are you so sure, both of you? we sat through the evidence. we sat through two trials and we have talked to the witnesses. some of the witnesses after all these years and they confessed on their own long before they confessed in the police
people to this crime. judge jeanine: the case went to trial, no physical evidence and no dna and no witnesses. and now in 2008 they find dna of a fifth person. a male. none of these guys dna was there. and that is why if that is the case and it is connected perhaps this dna can lead to a conviction. here is the problem. i think it is not sophisticated enough yet. kind of like mitochondrial on the father s side. a fifth person s dna. none of niece guys dna is here. they washed the scene because they he thought it was a fire. they didn t even know was a homicide scene. when you have a fire, they lose a lot of evidence but certain evidence especially toxic evidence when the rape occurs within the body cavity actually will be well preserved and in this case when we call
people to this crime. judge jeanine: the case went to trial, no physical evidence and no dna and no witnesses. and now in 2008 they find dna of a fifth person. a male. none of these guys dna was there. and that is why if that is the case and it is connected perhaps this dna can lead to a conviction. here is the problem. i think it is not sophisticated enough yet. kind of like mitochondrial on the father s side. a fifth person s dna. none of niece guys dna is here. they washed the scene because they he thought it was a fire. they didn t even know was a homicide scene. when you have a fire, they lose a lot of evidence but certain evidence especially toxic evidence when the rape occurs within the body cavity actually will be well preserved and in this case when we call
to corroborate what the lieutenant is saying as far as the relationship there. not only look to the letter but to what the killer did. no robbery and no jewelry taken. nothing of the sort to establish that i went in the house to grab anything or get anything. you went in the house for the express purpose of killing someone. there is some relationship there. he wanted her dead. just a shame that the dna and fingerprints are washed off or not available so they could match the killer with the crime. judge jeanine: and the fact that her throat was cut, what significance does that have in terms of a murderer and his victim? based on the autopsy you can tell what kind of knife is involved and how long she survived whether she has any chance to put a fight or any defensive type injur injury. lots of forensic evidence needs to be fully analyzed early on. and the individual probably didn t want to see her suffer.