people to this crime. >> judge jeanine: the case went to trial, no physical evidence and no dna and no witnesses. and now in 2008 they find dna of a fifth person. a male. none of these guys' dna was there. >> and that is why if that is the case and it is connected perhaps this dna can lead to a conviction. >> here is the problem. i think it is not sophisticated enough yet. kind of like mitochondrial on the father's side. a fifth person's dna. none of niece guys dna is here. they washed the scene because they he thought it was a fire. they didn't even know was a homicide scene. >> when you have a fire, they lose a lot of evidence but certain evidence especially toxic evidence when the rape occurs within the body cavity actually will be well preserved and in this case when we call