including of course, his crack cocaine addiction. but he was not making millionshi from his expertise when iten i comes to hard drugs,, , you name it. instead, he was allegedly selling access t drugso what ise as the brand. that brand, of course, would be his father, joe biden, his position, the vice president of this country. new bombshell, closed door testimony today from hunter biden s longtime business partner and friend, devon archer was devastating for the biden family syndicate s that supportat them. in a moment, we re going to take you inside of that hearino tag with house oversight committee chairman james comer and house judiciary chairman jim jordan. but let s begin with what we know fro m archer s testimony from earlier today. first, joe biden s repeated promise that he never had anything to do with his son s business deals. that was an outright lie, both as a candidate and a president.. joe biden also repeatedly lied about.
BBC presenter Huw Edwards is revealed as the anchor accused of paying for explicit images, sparking a media frenzy about the credibility of news publishers
through how bad this is for the bbc as an organisation? as an organisation? it is awful, that is probably as an organisation? it is awful, that is probably the as an organisation? it is awful, that is probably the word - as an organisation? it is awful, that is probably the word to . that is probably the word to describe it. the bbc stance not of looking evasive, slow to act, for example, why wasn t this presenter taken off air immediately? why has this gone on for months? if these allegations are proved to be true, the bbc is known for trust and transparency, people will be very, very angry with his accusations, and also an abuse of power, an older male presenter paying the younger person thousands and thousands of pounds for explicit sexual images which funded a crack cocaine addiction. which funded a crack cocaine addiction- which funded a crack cocaine addiction. ~ . ., ., addiction. what reaction have we been saying addiction. what reaction have we been saying to addicti
was used to fund a crack cocaine addiction, and that is why she had got so desperate and contacted the bbc, then a newspaper. bbc, then a newspaper. questions around the bbc, then a newspaper. questions around the individuals bbc, then a newspaper. questions around the individuals involved - bbc, then a newspaper. questions around the individuals involved in l around the individuals involved in this case, put the spotlight is on the bbc itself. how will this damage the bbc itself. how will this damage the reputation of the bbc? i the bbc itself. how will this damage the reputation of the bbc? the reputation of the bbc? i think it has already the reputation of the bbc? i think it has already damaged the reputation of the bbc? i think it has already damaged the - it has already damaged the reputation of the bbc. serious questions about why it took so long for the bbc to act, if allegations were made in may, why was this presenter not taken off air? why would they allowed to con
family at the centre of these accusations. family at the centre of these accusations. ., ., ., , ., , , accusations. charlotte, obviously individuals at accusations. charlotte, obviously individuals at the accusations. charlotte, obviously individuals at the heart accusations. charlotte, obviously individuals at the heart of- accusations. charlotte, obviously individuals at the heart of this, i individuals at the heart of this, but in the spotlight is the bbc itself is an organisation. how damaging is this? it is incredibly dama . in: damaging is this? it is incredibly damaging and damaging is this? it is incredibly damaging and could damaging is this? it is incredibly damaging and could be - damaging is this? it is incredibly - damaging and could be cataclysmic, i think. i mean, you have a question of trust. if these allegations are true, was it a breach of trust, an abuse of power? an older male presenter paying a teenager thousands and thousands of pounds for explicit sex