through how bad this is for the bbc as an organisation? as an organisation? it is awful, that is probably as an organisation? it is awful, that is probably the as an organisation? it is awful, that is probably the word - as an organisation? it is awful, that is probably the word to . that is probably the word to describe it. the bbc stance not of looking evasive, slow to act, for example, why wasn t this presenter taken off air immediately? why has this gone on for months? if these allegations are proved to be true, the bbc is known for trust and transparency, people will be very, very angry with his accusations, and also an abuse of power, an older male presenter paying the younger person thousands and thousands of pounds for explicit sexual images which funded a crack cocaine addiction. which funded a crack cocaine addiction- which funded a crack cocaine addiction. ~ . ., ., addiction. what reaction have we been saying addiction. what reaction have we been saying to addicti
was used to fund a crack cocaine addiction, and that is why she had got so desperate and contacted the bbc, then a newspaper. bbc, then a newspaper. questions around the bbc, then a newspaper. questions around the individuals bbc, then a newspaper. questions around the individuals involved - bbc, then a newspaper. questions around the individuals involved in l around the individuals involved in this case, put the spotlight is on the bbc itself. how will this damage the bbc itself. how will this damage the reputation of the bbc? i the bbc itself. how will this damage the reputation of the bbc? the reputation of the bbc? i think it has already the reputation of the bbc? i think it has already damaged the reputation of the bbc? i think it has already damaged the - it has already damaged the reputation of the bbc. serious questions about why it took so long for the bbc to act, if allegations were made in may, why was this presenter not taken off air? why would they allowed to con