disclosure forms. what did you find in the financial disclosure form? we should keep in mind almost four years ago, donald put out a statement saying that the financial disclosure form required a president was not designed for a man of mr. trump s great wealth. yes. absolutely right. absolutely right. one of the things we don t know is of the more than $300 million of debts, what are the terms of those debts? are there covenants he has to keep up or he could have balloon paints put put upon him in of? who owns those debts and can call them in? if he s paying on average 5% on the debts he has and he s making 5% of the total revenue, that means he s got about $58 million to $7 million a year to play with. given his lifestyle, that may not be enough. he may be under serious financial pressure. we need to have a much better understanding of who has leverage over him, what he is dependent on and take a good
oakland taxpayers invested in the raiders, and other costs in this suit. raiders owner mark davis told espn the lawsuit is meritless and malicious. oakland s mayor, though, says the nfl needs to pay for what they re doing. the nfl shakedown has got to stop. the city of oakland and particularly the raider nation are filing a much-deserved lawsuit to demonstrate that the nfl has not only violated antitrust laws but also its contracts, its promises, its covenants with its fans and the good cities that create the brand that the raiders are today. reporter: davis said he wants to play in oakland one more season. the team and the city have not agreed on the lease. if the raiders don t stay in oakland. san diego, santa claire areno, and las vegas are santa
about going forward with it. wood row wilson famously as part of his 14 points to remake the world wanted open covenants openly arrived at. there has to be a certain degree of privacy and secrecy in the conduct of diplomacy, whether congress wants to set foot in this dark and bloody ground of controversy, i m not sure. that s a fair point that i was that s why i was raising the question for the senator. one can see the overwhelming interest in this meeting. and yet we all know how precedent works, tony, if you go down that road, then you don t necessarily have a limiting principle. what are your thoughts on the larger difficult questions facing the nation, what to do about this, what happens in a situation where you still have a constitutionally elected individual here, and no way to address what many people, including according to reports, people in this trump s own administration viewed, as a cataclysmic disloyal failure of
country as impressive as you possibly can. why would you choose the most impressive, possible people we are bringing the most impressive people. if you look at technology companies, the enormous number of people who are immigrants who started those covenants, small businesses, same thing. you look at any field of science, research me when i m not arguing against started those covenants, small tucker: citizens who came in here and their parents, and their siblings, possibly their grandparents and uncles too. that s not too. what you said is not true but we don t allow grandparents into this country. we don t allow countries to to my cousins to come in. we don t have any categories along that. if you listen to your show, the people on fox news, to donald trump hold on, tucker. let me finish my point. if you listen to just what s going on, you would think the family immigration system is somehow out of control.
folks have a tough time getting in and out of their own houses. it is understandable, but that s why you have home openers associations and cooperation between neighbors. and everything doesn t have to run into court. as has been stated this has been going on for 17 years. this turns into the war on christmas. and the war on christianity taking place in this country. any religious symbolism among christians will be attacked by individuals. that s the rope we have protections for religious libertyerties in the country. because people enjoy the play, doesn t mean it has to stop. okay, it is on there. there s all kinds of. people that aren t baby jesus. yeah,. that s. is that strictly a religious display. towards the promotion of the religious holiday. you usecular symbols it does not take away the religious under pinning. that s why we can t have covenants restricting people against free speech. and infringing on the rights of