Fccs decision and the restoring Internet Freedom order was permissible and was, essentially, completely upheld. Its a big win for consumers, its a big win for innovators, big win for investment in broadband in america. And essentially e what the court said was that the fccs decision to regulate Broadband Internet access as an Information Service, as it largely has been for the last 20 years outside of a twoyear period under the title ii order, was permissible. Its consistent with Supreme Court precedent, and this d. C. Circuit was not going to make a determination that the fccs crassification classification was incorrect. Because its within their discretion as the Expert Agency to classify broadband as an Information Service or as a telecommunication service. What it did also say was that the commission and the one area where the commissions decision was vacated, which doesnt come up until page 121 of the report. Everything up to that point was upheld. That, look, the fcc, you dont hav
Joining us to discuss this issue gigi sohn, former fcc chair tom wheelers adviser currently with the Georgetown Law Institute for technology. And the Senior Vice President at u. S. Telecom, trade Association Patrick halley washington, d. C. Give us of lawyers assessment of what the d. C. Court of appeals ruled. The d. C. Court of appeals ruled that the secs decision was permissible in the industry storing Internet Freedom order. And it was completely upheld. As a big win for consumers and innovators and a big win for broadband in america. Essentially, with the court said to that the secs decision regulate Broadband Internet access as an Information Service as it largely has been for the last 20 years outside of a twoyear. Under the title to order, was permissible. It is consistent with Supreme Court precedent and this d. C. Circuit judge going to make a determination that the fccs classification was incorrect. Because it is within their discretion as the Expert Agency to classify broad
This week on the communicators, discussion of the recent d. C. Court of appeals decision on internet regulation, also known as Net Neutrality. Joining us to discuss this issue gigi sohn, former fcc chair tom wheelers adviser, currently with the Georgetown Law Institute for technology. And the Senior Vice President at u. S. Telecom, trade Association Patrick halley washington, d. C. Give us of lawyers assessment of what the d. C. Court of appeals ruled. The d. C. Court of appeals ruled that the secs decision was permissible in the industry storing Internet Freedom order. It was completely upheld. It was a big win for consumers and innovators and a big win for broadband in america. Essentially, with the court said was that the secs decision to regulate Broadband Internet access as an Information Service as it largely has been for the last 20 years outside of a twoyear period. Under the title to order, was permissible. It is consistent with Supreme Court precedent and this d. C. Circuit j
People. The shooters might have escape on bart. More from Crime Reporter henry lee. Reporter this is video making the rounds on social media showing one of the two shooters at the tanforan mall in san bruno. He is opening fire on the second floor of the food court. Surveillance video obtained by ktvu shows a group of young people scattering after the shots are fired. Police say they had argued with another group just before the shooting. I was standing right behind here. Suddenly we hear a lot of shouts. Shots were going pop. Reporter a dashcam shows the chaos that shoppers flee into the parking lot. Police say the two shooters escaped despite a Quick Response by officers from across the peninsula. An officer was already in the mall when the shots were fired. The officer was on the first floor of the food court reported hearing gunfire on the second floor. The boat a boy he was shot in the stunner. His Staff Sergeant in the mall rushed to help him. Its 12yearold boy was hit in the leg.
Send a form to these places. So i dont see where thats any harder for younger people. And the other thing that i kind of disagree with annual Supreme Court roundup. Great to see such a robust gathering for this event. Please keep in mind theres an opportunity for q a after the remarks from our speaker. Well ask you to line up at the mics here and here in order to ask questions. I have the honor of introducing todays speaker who will be regaling us with his always fascinating insights on the Supreme Courts just completed term. It was certainly an eventful term so there should be no shortage of fascinating material. For example, as you know, chief justice blackmon, i mean, roberts [ laughter ] continued his solemnic approach to controversial cases. Splitting the baby and sending mixed messages in ways that left everyone unhappy in one way or another. One thing that has become Crystal Clear this term is that for good or ill, the court now truly deserves its moniker as the roberts court. A