Was 25 n the s p 500 better than average over the last month. We are waiting on the let us check of japan, as the pandemic puts more pressure on the economy already sliding into recession. Inflation numbers are due at this hour. Haidi lets check in on the markets. We had a pretty tepid handover from the u. S. Stocks edging higher. Volumes still below what we have seen over the past month or so. Very much a rangebound trading session. We continue to seek a new catalyst. We continue to see rising cases across the u. S. , driving the idea of a second wave. Beijing struggling with a second wave as well. Conflicting data not giving a great deal of intel as to what the future holds. We are dealing and upside on s p futures, up about. 3 . Nikkei futures also a little bit higher, japan weighing the frostburg of reopening. Also the potential demise when it comes to tourism. Sydney futures are a little bit to the downside at the moment. We could see a modest bounce at the start of trading here i
First will be taken advantage of. Our state and federal governments as well as our nations largest corporations have a responsibility to do what is right. And let me end by saying this, this virus doesnt care whether or not youre republican or whether or not youre a democrat. It should not be about party or politics. This is will health and safety of our nations food workers and our food supply. And as such, no company should be shielded from the responsibility for adopting irresponsible practices that foster the spread of this virus through their facilities. For the sake of this country that i know that we all love i urge you to Work Together to do what is right for these workers. And, again, thank you for your time and id be pleased to answer questions you may have. Thank you very much. Miss dixon. Good afternoon, chairman graham, Ranking Member feinstein and members of the committee. Im grateful for the opportunity to testify today. Im rebecca dixon, executive director of the Nation
This is for an argument in the case of versus truck. Nice to see you again. Thank you. Thomas byron on behalf of the government defend it with is ecker for the department of Defense Office of general counsel. This case is about an internal transfer of funds among deities accounts. In the internal transfer itself, didnt harm plaintiffs in fact they contend otherwise for the content that their interests will harmed by the subsequent downstream use of those funds for construction of border barriers and roads. But the transfer itself was authorized by a provision in the appropriations act. In that provision was not designed to protect the kind of interest that the plaintiffs here assert against quote recreational a set environmental that they face. This zone of interest requirement which is the universal requirement, so weather they are seeking a review of the ata or on an equitable overviews, claim, and applies in any event and it asked this quote to determine whether those kinds of inter
Hey edward. Reporter yeah, neil maybe the market is priced in the usmca will eventually get done but i have multiple sources stakeholders to usmca as well as congressional sources all being told that a deal with mexico over the changes to usmca has been finished. These sources are also told that canada would sign off on this deal and now a congressional source telling me that the language will be finalized in the next 24 hours and this deal is reratified by mexico also, the ratification process will be finished in canada and a vote is set here in the United States for ratification and the mexican trade negotiators back here in washington today this all center s around enforcement of labor provisions. And the House Speaker wanted the u. S. Inspectors to go in and make sure that mexico complies with workers, making 16 an hour , as well as other regulations. What mexico settled on is a neutral third party as well as the mexican and u. S. Representatives looking at compliance. Now with the
Club versus trump. Proceed. Nice to see you again. Thank you, chief judge thomas. May it please the court on behalf of the defendants. With me is karen hekker from the department of defense, general counsel. This case is about an internal transfer of funds among dods accounts and the internal transfer itself didnt harm plaintiffs, in fact, they dont contend otherwise, they contend that their interests were harmed by the subsequent downstream use of funds from the construction at border barriers and roads. But the transfer itself was authorized by a provision in the dod precipitations act, and that provision was not designed to protect the kinds of interest that the plaintiffs here assert, the kinds of recreational aesthetic and Environmental Concerns that theyve raised. The zone of interest requirement, which is a universal requirement, whether theyve whether theyre seeking refew under the apa or under an equitable it applies in any event and asks the court to determine whether those k