God save the United States and this honorable court. This morning we will hear argument in case 19177 the United States agency for International Development versus the alliance for open society international. I note at the outset that Justice Kagen is recused in this case. Mr. Michelle . Justice, may it please20 years ago, the hiv aids the court. Pandemic was devastating the world. In response, president bush proposed since reauthorized three times, the act has committed nearly 80 billion to global aids relief. It has worked. The funding condition at issue here requires recipients to have a policy opposing prostitution and sex trafficking, which Congress Found are coercive practices that spread hivaids. This court held that a flight that condition to respondents, domestic entities violates the unconstitutional conditions doctrine but respondents sought more and the question is whether the condition can still be applied to foreign grant recipients operating abroad. It can, for two reaso
Honorable, the chief justice and the associate justices of the Supreme Court of the United States. All persons having business before the honorable, the Supreme Court of the United States are admonished to give their attention with the court is now sitting with the United States and this honorable court. This morning we will hear argument in case 19177, the United States agency for International Development versus the alliance for open Society International. I know at the outset that Justice Kagan is recused in this case. Mr. Michelle. Mr. Chief Justice Manny please the court, 20 years ago the hivaids pandemic was devastating the world in response president bush proposed that congress adopted leadership act, since reactor rice three times theyve committed 80 billion to global aids relief, it is worth saving more than 17 million lives in the most successful American Foreign aid efforts since the marshall plan. The funding can issue requires recipients travel policy prostitution and sex
Speech. The other point i would add is that even the clearly identified , i think theerseas government would concede they have First Amendment rights when they act here in the United States as they often do when they come here for meetings or to publish papers or participate in conferences and of the problem with the pledge requirement is that it binds these organizations forever and for all purposes. Justice breyer . It seems to me the government is prepared to concede that you, care usa, does not have to oppose prostitution. But they say the First Amendment does not prevent them from telling care india that it has to oppose. So why dont you simply write a grants to get all the money yourself and give it to care india . That, yourlem with honor, is that according to the government the policy requirement still binds the u. S. Organization in the following way. If care u. S. Gets the money and some grants to care india, it must carry the burden of the government in imposing the policy r
The chief justice and the associate justices of the supreme court. I note at the outset that Justice Kagan is recused in this case. Mr. Michelle . Hiv aidsrs ago, the pandemic was devastating the world. In response, president bush reauthorizedince three times, the act has committed nearly 80 billion to global aids relief. It has worked. Funding condition at issue to haveuires recipients a policy opposing prostitution and sex trafficking, which Congress Found are coercive practices that spread hivaids. A flightt held that that condition to respondents, domestic entities violates the unconstitutional conditions doctrine but respondents sought more and the question is whether the condition can still be applied to foreign grant recipients operating abroad. It can, for two reasons. Foreign entities lack Constitutional Rights, so they cannot ring constitutional conditions claim. Neither can respondents, because they are not subject to the funding condition. Next to their victory in this cour
Tensions running high in india are the Prime Minister Narendra Modis controversial citizenship lol violence between hindus and muslims has left many dead can the Indian Government keep control of the situation and will it consider withdrawing the act this is inside story. Hello welcome to the program im Adrian Finnegan thousands of indians have been protesting for months now against a controversial law that they say discriminates against muslims but the tension around the citizenship Amendment Act has taken a dangerous to the capital new delhi has seen days of violence between the communities some of the was it in decades hindu crowds have been accused of attacking muslims on the streets dozens of people were killed in 3 days of confrontations that began on monday from a start the runner modi has called for calm his government has been under pressure since it passed the law that provides citizenship to immigrants from neighboring countries but excludes muslims modis critics accuse them