Luck with your campaign. That is to nice the reidout. All in with chris hayes starts now. Tonight on all in. We will expand the tax deduction for startups to $50,000. 61 days out, the candidates home their messages. Childcare is childcare. There s something that you have to happen. Tonight, the big battleground fight with pennsylvania governor josh shapiro. Then, the big news from today s criminal arraignment of the republican nominee. What we can now expect is perhaps even more material that is not yet public could come to the public eye and in the weeks before election day. Plus, new details on the russian campaign to pay maga to spread putin propaganda. This is psychotic. Ukraine is the enemy of this country. Ukraine is our enemy. And why all those gifts to supreme court clearance thomas aren t that dissimilar. I like to keep that friendship. All in starts right now. Good evening from new york, i m chris hayes, we have some breaking news tonight, an exclusive scoop. It s this. Donal
it for weeks, it suspended fda approval of mifepristone, th drug that, as you know, ha been safely used for more than 20 years, has become the mos common method for terminatin pregnancies in this country. within an hour, another federa judge in washington state, contradicted that ruling ordering the fda to keep the drug available at 17 states in d.c. president biden last night condemning the texas route calling it, quote, the next bi step before the national ban o abortion by republican elected officials have vowed to make a lot america. vice president kamala harris committed to fighting back there is no question, president and i are gonna stan with the women of america, and do everything we can to ensure that women have the ability to make decisions about their health care, their reproductiv health care, in a manner tha is what they need, and the decide that, not their government the drug will continue to b available for now, since the texas judge gave the fda seven days
altogether so, it wasn t a battle between the federal government in state, but rather, the federal government s conflicting regulations wouldn t exist anymore. lisa, i have about a minute left, i think the big question here, do you see this landin before the supreme court absolutely. there s no way that this kit that they can get resolved without it usually, what we see is what s called a circuit slip, went to federal appeals courts diffe on something, and then escalates to the supreme court one of the tools that th conservative movement learne during the trump administration, how to leapfrog appeals cour and sent something directly to the supreme court when the wanted a particular outcome. here, i expect a department of justice to use that on its own if they don t get an answe fairly soon, from the fift circuit court of appeals about whether a state of judge kacsmaryk s order would happen meaning, they would furthe pause his or her after thi coming friday. they will take that to t
terms of a legal command to provide these documents? i mean, we know the white house has not provide one single document up to this point. what is different? what is the expectation that the white house will comply? whyou get a final court o that s a whole different ball game. these things go to the supreme court and the white house finds itself disobeying judicial orders instead of a congressional subpoena. they wanted feemt raise the legal temperature of all of these kind of deliberations and compel the courts to sort of act more quickly and put the force of law behind these congressional requests. and of course that s true, sort of like, you know, what could the trump administration do if the supreme court said famously, the historical lesson is the response to the court, i think was andrew jackson, you and what army some of course that could rachet up again, that s what democrats are counting on, if the white house then refuses those kind of document requests could that lead to