Including how most effectively to secure the government of the days political and legislative objectives and agenda with all of the aspects that that brings including modern presentation. Whether and when it might be appropriate to terminate or interrupt existing business, including the prevention of bills in the courts of passage, and the setting of a new legislative agenda at the queen speech. The interval between parliamentary sessions and whether that period should be extended, whether a new queens speech with a new differently focused national and parliamentary end legislative agenda should be set. And how long would be needed and desirable. That is we submit both the government of the day and the opposition presuming its proper function in challenging government, and their own political agendas, their own perceptions of what will and will not operate. And the ultimate weaponry of course remains in the hands of parliament, motions of no confidence, two thirds voting foran of no co
To the second u. S. Circuit court of appeals for oral argument in a case where President Trumps attorneys will ask the court to block access to the president s financial information. In this case. There is no doubt this dispute comes to the court involving the house of representatives on one side and the president and his family members and elated businesses on the others. There is weight and importance in his individual capacity and not his official as the complaint says. The president is standing before the court in his individual capacity. It is the complaint that we have and the role we have for the plaintiff. I do want to note the number of statements three rely upon and the Background Information makes it clear that these subpoenas are being targeted to the president because he is president. Because, are you raising motive . I am not raising motive but looking to at the real object of the subpoena is. That is another really way of saying why they are doing it. Precludes motive an
This is an hour and 40 minutes. We will hear argument in donald j. Trump versus committee on Financial Services. Court, thereshe no doubt the dispute comes to the court involving the house of representatives on one side and the president and his family members on the other. I do want to note the number of statements three rely upon and the Background Information makes it clear that these subpoenas are being targeted to the president because he is president. When you say because, are you raising motive . I am not raising motive but looking to at the real object of the subpoena is. That is another way of saying why they are doing it. The motive precludes motive and rises above concerns that the house or the congress has taken one action and we think they are not. They are not taking the action you can delineate from their statements from authorizing resolutions themselves. There is Something Else completely going on. Many of the cases make it very clear you can inquire into what the real
I do want to note the number of statements three rely upon and the Background Information makes it clear that these subpoenas are being targeted to the president because he is president. When you say because, are you raising motive . I am not raising motive but looking to at the real object of the subpoena is. That is another way of saying why they are doing it. The motive precludes motive and rises above concerns that the house or the congress has taken one action and we think they are not. They are not taking the action you can delineate from their statements from authorizing resolutions themselves. There is Something Else completely going on. Many of the cases make it very clear you can inquire into what the real object is and what the legislative purpose is. Is that the real object as distinguished from no other object . In other words, they put something up as just a sham. I think the court in watkins is clear about this. The court is obligated to look carefully especially in a ca
A lower court has already ruled in favor of the committee. This is an hour and 40 minutes. We will hear argument in donald j. Trump versus committee on Financial Services. May it please the court, Pat Strawbridge on behalf of President Trump and the other plaintiffs and in this case. Theres no doubt the dispute comes to the court involving the house of representatives on one side and the president and his family members and related business on the other, bearing obvious weight and importance. [inaudible] certainly, the president is standing here before the court in his individual capacity that is what your complaint says that is the role we have as the plaintiff. But i do want to note the number of statements we rely upon and the Background Information and subpoenas makes it clear that these subpoenas are being targeted to the president because he is president. When you say because, are you raising motive . I am not raising motive, i am looking at the real object of the subpoena. That