Right with any ability to venture beat on the curtilage with a a firearm even locked ad unloaded, a matter of government grace period that he is inconsistent with text, history, tradition and this court cases. The text of the Second Amendment protects rights to keep and bear arms. That latter right makes clear that the Second Amendment protects rights that are not strictly limited to the premises. There is no historical analog for the cities prohibition on transporting firearms to places where the may be lawfully use. To the contrary, the Second Congress required the militia to take their own firearms from their homes to the training ground. The regulations on limiting where firearms may be discharged or were training may occur that the city invokes both underscore that the general rule was that firearms could be safely transported between and among places way they could be used and discharge. This court recognized as much in heller, both by recognizing the long history of handgun poss
Protect the climate boost Clean Energy Solutions and reforestation. Losing interactive content to inspire people to take action. Gives the series of global 3000 on t. W. Place. A global trade emergency and biggest prices in the history of the World Trade Organization. Arbitration system collapses in disarray after u. S. Pressure hollows out. Also on the program while Prime Minister collect his Nobel Peace Prize and the countrys poorest workers are still waiting for reforms of labor we have an exclusive report from the frontlines of the extreme need. Im chris cuomo welcome to the program as if global trade wasnt under enough pressure its now losing its ultimate empire the World Trade Organization will no longer be able to deliver a final trade dispute ruling starting on wednesday the bodys chief says this after Member States failed to solve a dispute over the way that cases have been handled successive u. S. Administrations have blocked the appointment of new judges to the w t os now ef
Okay thank you all for coming. Number one i would like to thank mr. Horwitz and his team at the Inspector Generals Office for doing a very thorough and professional job. I think the country owes him a debt of gratitude and i look forward to hearing his testimony wednesday in detail about his findings. The first thing i would like to address is that you have a statement by mr. Durham, the u. S. Attorney in connecticut that is looking at potential criminal liability in this matter. The attorney general bar and mr. We have three different views, i guess two of the views that there was there was no lawful predicate to begin the information. But thats not my concern right now. Three lawyers can reasonably disagree, and i trust mr. Horwitz to give an honest view. Lets assume for a moment that there was a lawful predicate. The bar is really low to open and enter counter investigation. The. I want to make is lets assume for a moment that it started out okay. It sure as hell did not end okay. W
Senator graham thank you all for coming. Number one, i would like to thank mr. Horowitz and his team at the inspector generals office. I think the country owes him a debt of gratitude and i look forward to hearing his testimony in detail about his findings. The first thing i would like to address is you have a statement by mr. The u. S. Attorney in connecticut who is looking at potential criminal liability regarding this matter. Attorney general barr and mr. Horowitz. Two of the views is that there was no lawful predicate to begin the investigation. Mr. Durham said he had more investigation than mr. Horowitz. Thats not my concern. Three lawyers can reasonably disagree and i trust mr. Horowitz to give his view. And if there was a predicate. The bar is really low and reasonable arctic can you lation is a low standard in law. Lets assume it started out ok but didnt end ok. What i have seen in this report and i hope some of you will look, while there may be reasonable differenceses whether
For doing a very thorough, professional job. I think the country owes him a debt of gratitude and i look forward to hearing his testimony in detail about his findings. Wednesday the first thing i would like to address is you have a statement by mr. Durham, the u. S. Attorney in connecticut, who is looking at potential criminal liability regarding this matter. Attorney general barr and mr. Horowitz. You have three different views, or i guess two of the views is that there was no lawful predicate to begin the investigation. I think mr. Durham said he had more investigation than mr. Horowitz. Thats not my concern. Three lawyers can reasonably disagree and i trust mr. Horowitz to give his view. Lets assume for a moment there was a lawful predicate. The bar is low to open up a counterintelligence investigation and a reasonable articulation is a low standard in the law. The point i want to make is, lets assume for a moment it started out ok but didnt end ok. What i see in this report, and no