Okay thank you all for coming. Number one i would like to thank mr. Horwitz and his team at the Inspector Generals Office for doing a very thorough and professional job. I think the country owes him a debt of gratitude and i look forward to hearing his testimony wednesday in detail about his findings. The first thing i would like to address is that you have a statement by mr. Durham, the u. S. Attorney in connecticut that is looking at potential criminal liability in this matter. The attorney general bar and mr. We have three different views, i guess two of the views that there was there was no lawful predicate to begin the information. But thats not my concern right now. Three lawyers can reasonably disagree, and i trust mr. Horwitz to give an honest view. Lets assume for a moment that there was a lawful predicate. The bar is really low to open and enter counter investigation. The. I want to make is lets assume for a moment that it started out okay. It sure as hell did not end okay. W
Senator graham thank you all for coming. Number one, i would like to thank mr. Horowitz and his team at the inspector generals office. I think the country owes him a debt of gratitude and i look forward to hearing his testimony in detail about his findings. The first thing i would like to address is you have a statement by mr. The u. S. Attorney in connecticut who is looking at potential criminal liability regarding this matter. Attorney general barr and mr. Horowitz. Two of the views is that there was no lawful predicate to begin the investigation. Mr. Durham said he had more investigation than mr. Horowitz. Thats not my concern. Three lawyers can reasonably disagree and i trust mr. Horowitz to give his view. And if there was a predicate. The bar is really low and reasonable arctic can you lation is a low standard in law. Lets assume it started out ok but didnt end ok. What i have seen in this report and i hope some of you will look, while there may be reasonable differenceses whether
Any code in high school in the house . All right. I first met Tulsi Gabbard a year ago this week when she spoke in exeter. After meeting and hearing her speak i knew she was my candidate. A breath of fresh air. First female combat veteran to run for president , been in congress seven years, incredible Foreign Policy experience. All the things we are missing in a commander in chief. I got involved to put together some events. Started posting about her event. Our good friend amanda, give her a round of applause. [applause] who is this Tulsi Gabbard . I said, we are putting together an event with her. Why dont you come out and meet her . So she did. I would say at that point amanda, you were feeling the loja. The aloha. Been helping ever since and been great and it we have been looking to put together house parties and we had Tulsi Gabbard at my Birthday Party. I said how would you feel about her coming to your house to meet everybody and a real intimate, great thing about New Hampshire,
Minority leader charles schumer. Uh, ok, thank you all for coming. Number one, i would like to thank mr. Horowitz and his team at the Inspector Generals Office for doing a very thorough, professional job. I think the country owes him a debt of gratitude and i look forward to hearing his testimony wednesday in detail about his findings. The first thing i would like to address is that you have a statement by mr. Durham, the u. S. Attorney in connecticut looking at potential criminal liability regarding this matter. The attorney general barr and mr. Horowitz. You have deep you have three different views, two of the views is that there was no lawful predicate to begin the investigation. I think mr. Durham said he had more information that mr. Horowitz at that is not my concern right now. Three lawyers can reasonably disagree and i trust mr. Horowitz to give an honest view. Lets assume for a moment that. Here was a lawful predicate the bar is low to open a counterintelligence investigation
Okay. Thank you, all, for coming number one, i would like to thank mr. Horowitz and his team at the Inspector Generals Office for doing a very thorough, professional, job. Think the country owes him a debt of gratitude and i look forward to hearing his testimony wednesday about, in detail, about his findings. The first thing id like to address is that you have a statement by mr. Durham, the u. S. Attorney in connecticut is looking at potential criminal liability regarding this matter. The attorney general barr and mr. Horowitz, you have three different views, well, i guess two of the views are that there was no lawful predicate to begin the investigation. I think mr. Durham says he had more information than mr. Horowitz, but thats not of thats not my concern right now. Three lawyers can reasonably disagree and, i trust mr. Horowitz to give an honest view. Lets assume for a moment there was a lawful predicate, the bar is low to open an investigation. Reasonable articulation is a pretty