in 1990, by a unanimous court led by justice brennan, by a 7-2 court in 1993, so it s a pretty well-established principle. you can sue. do you see this as i know you think about these things strategically as well as legally. do you see this as the most direct legal remedy for the kinds of conflicts of interests that we ve identified, is this the best way at it in terms of trying to remedy that kind of conflict? well, i think impeachment is the most direct. but it in terms of private ways, this is it. to see lots of individuals go after the enterprise, and it s a family enterprise. the only way to solve the problem for him would be to divest the whole family of these
greenhouse gas rules have gotten through. the bush administration bpa had a harder time than the obama epa. is has the d.c. circuit really been that unfriendly to the obama administration? in. in case after case, whether it is involving rules, implementing dodd-frank, whether it is involving cigarette warnings, for young people, whether it is allowing the department of labor to have additional people at the helm, epa regulations, this particular court led by judges who used lit nous tests, hostile to workers
bob, you re a major strategist. would you advise the president s re-election campaign to push forward on what this means, and what it means to millions of americans or would you tell them toe equally stress that willard mitt romney himself supported the mandate and made it law in massachusetts? i think romney s going to have a hard time in the debates because i think the moderators are even going to ask him about this. he s out of a rationale. he said it s a good idea but ought to be decided at the state level. it s not a federal subject. the court led by chief roberts who did a lot to reestablish the reputation of that said it is a function. he s standing up for the majority of americans, for the middle class, for all these folks with preexisting
comparemela.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from comparemela.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
he says i have served with 17 other judges, each a colleague and a friend on a court led by our superb chief judge merrick garland. i m so glad you pointed that out. when i was reading these remarks i was fascinated by that but it s not the first time, ariane, that he praised merrick garland. he called him supremely qualified for the high court. chuck grassley is going to take a big chunk of time in his opening statement to defend what democrats are calling out and that is a document dump. 42,000 domtds in his time in the bush white house and grassley will take time to defend that. is that right? that s right.grassley will t defend that. is that right? that s right. he s going to call brett