admissions scandal in a court filing today, federal prosecutors are calling for huffman to serve one month in jail plus a $20,000 fine prosecutors say huffman s conduct was deliberate and manifestly criminal writing to the judge, in the context of this case, neither probation nor home confinement in a large home in the hollywood hills with an infinity pool would constitute meaningful punishment. but huffman s attorneys filed their own sentencing memo today requesting no jail time, just probation plus the fine and 250 hours of community service. her memo includes letters of support from her husband william h. macy an actress eva longoria earlier this year, pleaded guilty to fraud charges admitting she paid a proctor $15,000 to correct answers on her daughter s s.a.t. boosting her score by about 400 points some parents charged in the scandal have rejected plea deals, including actress lori laughlin lester thank you there s been a tragedy at yosemite, a
this prize internal polling data with the russian operative, and perhaps why, because you see there, we know what was alluded to. it is redacted. the reason it was redacted is because of grand jury material. now, in the court filing today, the house judiciary committee argues there are several episodes that have this kind of information redacted and the committee needs it. they need it because the doj will not allow prosecution of a sitting president and they explained the house is the only institution of the federal government that can now hold president trump accountable for these actions. they also point to the planned questioning of former white house counselling don mcgahn, the star witness of the mueller report cited over 150 times. house judiciary making the case if there is grand jury testimony of the president s knowledge of these events and how his campaign approached all of it, that would shed light on what the president might have been trying to cover up with his repeated a
chairman paul manafort share this prize internal polling data with the russian operative, and perhaps why, because you see there, we know what was alluded to. it is redacted. the reason it was redacted is because of grand jury material. now, in the court filing today, the house judiciary committee argues there are several episodes that have this kind of information redacted and the committee needs it. they need it because the doj will not allow prosecution of a sitting president and they explained the house is the only institution of the federal government that can now hold president trump accountable for these actions. they also point to the planned questioning of former white house counselling don mcgahn, the star witness of the mueller report cited over 150 times. house judiciary making the case if there is grand jury testimony of the president s knowledge of these events and how his campaign approached all of it, that would shed light on what the president might have been trying to
version. that s maybe another reason why we should get that very volume one. we don t have the redacted version. maybe we should get that, because in the report or the version that congress got and we have seen publicly, there is information potentially revealing who it was that requested trump campaign chairman paul manafort share this prize internal polling data with the russian operative, and perhaps why, because you see there, we know what was alluded to. it is redacted. the reason it was redacted is because of grand jury material. now, in the court filing today, the house judiciary committee argues there are several episodes that have this kind of information redacted and the committee needs it. they need it because the doj will not allow prosecution of a sitting president and they explained the house is the only institution of the federal government that can now hold president trump accountable for these actions. they also point to the planned questioning of former white house
including a constitutional power of the utmost gravity, recommendation of articles of impeachment. that duty falls in the first instance to house committee on the judiciary. that is from the court filing today. we take that responsibility seriously. no one can be above the law, not even president trump. we ll now take some questions. yes. yes. so half of the members up here have jerry nadler: members of the committee field the questions. numbers have come out in support of impeachment, how are you dealing with disagreement with the speaker on that issue and especially heading into this six-week long recess, you expect the division to go away soon? jerry nadler: i don t know that there are real divisions