A reflection under gerald ford and nixon under an American Society that said, these people can sit downstairs in the movie theater, they can register to vote, why are a majority of americans can support this. My general view is, affirmative action has been enhanced. Thats what i told the president. And he was pleased to know. That when you lose, what five to four . Eight to one . Seven to one . What it is all said that in the ninth hitting you lost great. Decision all persons having business for the honorable Supreme Court. Landmark cases, see spans special history series, produced in partnership with the National Constitution center, exploring the human stories and constitutional dramas behind 12 Historic Supreme Court decisions. Mr. Chief justice and may it please the Court Welcome to landmark cases. Tonight, affirmative action, in 19 78th a Supreme Court issued the decision in this on what is called the bakke case the ucs affirmative Action Program was declared unconstitutional. The
Welcome to the 2020 georgia legislative policy forum. I am the president and ceo of the georgia Public Policy foundation. On behalf of our entire staff in the board of trustees, we are very glad you joined us. If you have attended this event in the past, you are well aware this years edition is quite different. Weve had to adapt to different circumstances. To this yearseme event, wisdom, justice, adaptation. Is theeve adaptation right focus for this years session. Oday is only the Opening Event over the next several weeks, we will be back here on tuesdays at 11 00 a. M. To explore the ways georgias businesses, families, and environment are adapting to a changing world. We will cover education, the budget, land use and transportation, the economy, housing, and health care. Panels ofciting experts lined up for each of them. We hope you will be able to join us for as many of those as you can. We are grateful to be joined on this journey by some key sponsors, without which our work with no
Captions Copyright National cable satellite corp. 2008 would either of your guests argue or say theres legitimacy to that argument that affirmative action per se is a right and my second question is about affirmative action on the federal level, a number of years ago i remembered there was a president ial candidate and one of his big campaign stump lines was the first thing he would do when he took his hand off the bible after he became president was sign an executive order to outlaw all federal affirmative action. Would it be that easy for a President Trump or any president to get rid of affirmative action that way . Thanks very much. Thank you. Let me start with your first question and then, randy, im sure has a lot of thoughts as well. I was involved in that case, the Southern Michigan case that youre talking about. I thought your question was great. It totally summarized exactly the issue which is you have in michigan and california state referendum that ban affirmative action in t
Nasdaq, we keep talking about this, up 4 on the week. Names thatl these have just done gang busters here. Up 10 on the day and you have lot of other names beaten down like the carnival cruises and some of those names. Really bounce back today. Up 8. 5 . Aluminum is big. Deflationarye forces that continue to hit this market and you really wonder if way for Market Participants search out companies with the strong cash and strong balance sheet. You have to think inflation comes as soon as some of that online. Omes you wonder when that demand comes online and how you turn around some of the disinflationary forces. Us Global Market strategist over there. The nextlook at earning season, which takes off on tuesday here in the u. S. Investors will be as forgiving as they were the previous earning season, given a little bit more clarity about how the economy is doing and the Health Pandemic is doing. Its a big week next week. Second quarter earning kick off next week. 22 over s p 500 companies
Finding no material differences between this case and whole womans health. On burdens it found that axis 620 would lead louisiana with just one clinic and one doctor providing abortions. At the same time it found that axis 20 when do nothing for Womens Health. In reversing the District Courts decision the fifth circuit committed to fundamental errors. First, it usurped the role of the District Court and disregarded nearly all of its factual findings. Second, the fifth circuit accepted legal arguments that this court rejected four years ago. Nothing however has changed that would justify such a legal aboutface. In fact, even more medical organizations have joined the ana to say that admitting privileges imposed barriers to abortion with no benefit to patients and at this impact is not state dependent. Finally, the states 11th hour objection to thirdparty standings runs up against still more binding precedent. The court squarely held in [inaudible] that such objections are waivable and t