Commissioner moore commissioner richards we are expecting commissioner hillis to arrive shortly first, it is the items for continuance item one at 400 alabama street proposed to february 2015 and item 2 for case at the 276 hartford is proposed for continuance march 5 and item 3 the little go yosemite fish passage is proposed to april 2015 and the next at 8093fourths street is inner definite continuance and item 5 at 191220th street is proposed for indefinite continuance commissioners further in under our regular calendar the case at 1010 bush street it property for continuance until february 12, 2015, i have no speaker cards. Thank you any Public Comment on item items for continuance seeing none, Public Comment is closed commissioner antonini. Move to continue items 1, 2, 3 the dates proposed 4 and 5 indefinite and item 14 to february 12th. On that motion commissioners to continue councilmember sharp commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner fong and co
Move to continue items 1, 2, 3 the dates proposed 4 and 5 indefinite and item 14 to february 12th. On that motion commissioners to continue councilmember sharp commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner fong and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 68 to zero and place you under our cds constitute a consent calendar, are considered the planning commission, and may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission, there will be no separate discussion of these items which event the matter shall consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. Item 6 case no. 2014 c and d on Market Street a condominium conversion and item 7 c at one newhall conditional use authorization. Any Public Comment on the consent calendar. Commissioners we have a card for the Market Street item to be pulled off of content. He okay. Well hear it at the girn of the regular calendar. Very good commiss
Somehow congress hadnt acted enough or quickly enough or expansively enough to justify the extension of his authority under the constitution. But if i can ask my friend from maine another question to drill down on her earlier point it seems to me that the senator from illinois, the distinguished minority whip, he is making some suggestion that really what we are mad at is the people who benefit from this executive action which to my mind, could not be further from the truth. We all understand the aspirations of people who want a better way of life and opportunity, but isnt it true that as you have said and ill just ask you to repeat it perhaps or expand upon it. Isnt it true that when we all take an oath to uphold the constitution laws of the United States, whether youre the president or whether youre the senator, we have a sacred obligation to make sure that no branch including the president usurps the authority of another branch or violates those constitutional limitations . Ms. Co m
Work led to the president announcement in november of the plan for internet regulation, a plan which the report said blindsided them right chairman wheeler for the compromise. And of course a few insiders were quizzed him about what was transpiring. Heres what a leader for the governmentfunded group fight for the feature had to say. We have been hearing for weeks from our allies that the only thing that can stop tom wheeler from moving ahead with this sham proposal to get Net Neutrality is if we could get the president to step in. So we did everything in our power to make that happen. And now we get to celebrate. Congratulations. And what the press has caught called opened the door to a plethora of special interest activates. Fight for the future free press and Public Knowledge just to name a few. And indeed even before activists were blocking determine straggly late last year, some of them had met with executive branch officials. What about the rest of the American People . They certa
Policy this is good but we also need to give unlicensed services and wifi its proper due. After all, wifi is how we get on line in public and at home. Wifi is also how our wireless carriers managed their networks, in fact today nearly one half of all wireless data connections are at some point offloaded on to unlicensed spectrum. Wifi is how we foster innovation, because the low barriers to entry for unlicensed airwaves make them perfect sandboxes for experimentation. And wifi is a boone to the economy. The Economic Impact of unlicensed activity has been estimated at more than 140 billion annually. By any measure, thats big. So we need to make unlicensed Services Like wifi a priority in our spectrum policy, at the fcc, we are doing just that with our upcoming work. Its going to take more than this to keep up with demand. Thats why i think the time is right to explore greater unlicensed use in the upper portion of the five gigahertz band. I think goingforward were going to be on guard t