At 33 degrees right now san somewhat 32. And our first set of 20s nevado at 28 degrees fairfield at 29 degrees right now santa rosa, youre right on the cusp down at 30 degrees currently so we are already cooling down or next couple of hours ahead of us are anticipated to be the coldest of the morning so if youre stepping outside here just a minute or 2 get ready for that russia cool air that may just wait youre right up as you get outside this tuesday. Robin i had my heat are blasting this morning. John i was like is this thing even working in socalled over to the bay bridge toll plaza were checking in on the traffic which is doing fine by the way you may need to leave a little early to warm up that car before you take off the drive into San Francisco looks really good. No problems at the toll plaza an easy trip across the upper deck 7 minutes. Thats a good drive time off to the fremont street exit, heres 92, this is a traffic rolling out of hayward westbound which is a commute side ri
In san anselmo i had the right at freezing right below it this morning. So temperatures are frigid to start we have some very Cool Conditions. And you can expect those over the course of the next few hours. Im talking what to expect this afternoon still to come in your forecast, rob for folks heading into San Francisco. They can expect lots of heavy traffic at the bay bridge toll plaza. Yes sir line is getting longer but at least were hot spot free. So heres a live. Look you see all the folds stacked appear beyond 8. 80 back to the bottom of the maze. What we can see is an accident near the metering lights so after this camera shot theres an accident involving a big rig thats already off to the fly, but you know a little bit to stare at for folks in traffic so 13 minutes and growing into San Francisco, not bad 80 south and stevenson heading through fremont just getting word of a new injury accident. Thats going back you up into union city so its already slow with commute traffic now we
Authority the da has under state law as to the president , the Second Circuit is wrong and should be reversed. If not reversed the decision weapon isis 2300 local das, overwhelming number of them elected to office and thereby accountable to local constituencies. The decision would allow any da to distract and interfere with a sitting president , subjects the president a local prejudice that can influence prosecutorial decisions and the grand jury can be utilized issue compulsory criminal process in the form of subpoenas targeting the president. This is not mere speculation. It is precisely what has taken place in this case with the subpoena we challenge. In the argument just concluded we asserted the subpoenas did not serve a legitimate legislative purpose and were burdensome. Yet the da copy almost verbatim the House Oversight Committee Subpoena with an additional 13 words which seek the president s tax returns without revealing the exact same language utilized by two congressional co
We will hear the argument is next in case 19635 donald trump versus cyrus vance. Nno County District attorney and that history has issued criminal process against the sitting president of the United States and fortit good reason, e constitution doesnt allow it. Temporary president ial immunity is constitutionally required by article two and accordingly, the supremacy clause to face any authority they have under that state law as to the president. The Second Circuit is wrong and should be reversed. If not reversed the decision weaponizeon is 2300 local and or an overwhelming number of them are elected and thereby accountable to the local constituencies. The decision would allow any two giraffes, distract or interfere with the sitting president to the local prejudice that could influence prosecutorial decisions and those who can then utilize the criminal process in the form of subpoena targeting the president. This isnt speculation. It is what is taking place in the subpoena of the chall
7488003. Or you can join us on twitter, cspanwj, or facebook. Com cspan. We will get your thoughts here in just a minute, but first joining us on the phone here is lawrence hurley, a Supreme Court correspondent. What was the question put to the courts and what did they decide . Guest thanks. The question is whether sex discrimination within the title vii, which is the federal law that bars employment discrimination, whether sex discrimination applied to Sexual Orientation and gender identity. The court in the ruling ,esterday said that it does which was surprising to some because you had chief Justice Roberts and justice and neil gorsuch joining the four liberals, as you mentioned, in that ruling. The court basically said that any kind of discrimination on the basis of sex is kind of a broad concept and that can include elements of discrimination that concern Sexual Orientation or gender identity. It reads prohibits employment through discrimination based on color, sex, andigion, natio