Test captions Copyright National cable satellite corp. 2008 i did want to make that distinction, thats one point. Yes. And making a second point you think at least that in the context of the whole sweep of history, et cetera, Congress Decision not to do this lends some further support to the idea of application of the settled interpretation. Thats absolutely right. Not to draw those infrensz. I will further add to that, at that 96 point, there was also congress was making these choices at a time when there was over 100 years of established meaning and it was aware of that meaning, we know that from the 1952 legislative history and there was so much law on this, including the 99 guidance or not the 99 guidance, but including the a. G. Decisions that congress was adopting the established meaning of public charge, yet again, while making these other affirmative choices about what to do. The next thing is, the 1999 guidance comes out and for two administrations of two parties nobody says,
Test captions Copyright National cable satellite corp. 2008 i did want to make that distinction, thats one point. Yes. And making a second point you think at least that in the context of the whole sweep of history, et cetera, Congress Decision not to do this lends some further support to the idea of application of the settled interpretation. Thats absolutely right. Not to draw those infrensz. I will further add to that, at that 96 point, there was also congress was making these choices at a time when there was over 100 years of established meaning and it was aware of that meaning, we know that from the 1952 legislative history and there was so much law on this, including the 99 guidance or not the 99 guidance, but including the a. G. Decisions that congress was adopting the established meaning of public charge, yet again, while making these other affirmative choices about what to do. The next thing is, the 1999 guidance comes out and for two administrations of two parties nobody says,
Test captions Copyright National cable satellite corp. 2008 i did want to make that distinction, thats one point. Yes. And making a second point you think at least that in the context of the whole sweep of history, et cetera, Congress Decision not to do this lends some further support to the idea of application of the settled interpretation. Thats absolutely right. Not to draw those infrensz. I will further add to that, at that 96 point, there was also congress was making these choices at a time when there was over 100 years of established meaning and it was aware of that meaning, we know that from the 1952 legislative history and there was so much law on this, including the 99 guidance or not the 99 guidance, but including the a. G. Decisions that congress was adopting the established meaning of public charge, yet again, while making these other affirmative choices about what to do. The next thing is, the 1999 guidance comes out and for two administrations of two parties nobody says,
The testimony will be relevant and i will put in the scale in favor of impeachment. We can say they should have gotten a redaction by redaction. Take the unredacted report and go through and make those determinations. You dont think that runs into the walter nixon problem . Again, understand the court saying it is not interested in this argument, but i think if this goes to a high higher there isat will be no reason why we should be putting courts in a position at all, but going to undertake this endeavor, but perhaps with guidelines we will argue about a getrict court, you dont everything, you have to show a and not geted need them grand jury information. How long would that take . Know. Ont i think that would be up to the District Court. I guess im not clear to what the District Court does. The Community Says your honor, it is relevant. The whole notion that the District Court cannot control the senate trial or control documents ordered to be released, this is a question of goesar th
Case challenging Prime Minister borussia else in suspension of parliament and whether his advice to the queen to do so was justifiable. Critics claim the Prime Minister did this to avoid opposition to his brexit plan. The British Parliament is scheduled to return on october 14, roughly two weeks before the deadline for the u. K. To leave the European Union. Milady, milord. Issue was nonjustifiable because of what was political. It was political for two reasons. One was that it trespassed on the proper province of the executive and the other was the lack of judicial or manageable standard. Be charm. T could i paraphrase, of course, from case. Inion in another much reference has been made to constitutional principle. Constitutional principle may embrace legal rules, but it may also embrace convention. Convention that is not amenable to enforcement in a court of law , and an example of that was reference tor 1 in the convention which was expressed in reform but nevertheless remained the c