Milady, milord. Issue was nonjustifiable because of what was political. It was political for two reasons. One was that it trespassed on the proper province of the executive and the other was the lack of judicial or manageable standard. Be charm. T could i paraphrase, of course, from case. Inion in another much reference has been made to constitutional principle. Constitutional principle may embrace legal rules, but it may also embrace convention. Convention that is not amenable to enforcement in a court of law , and an example of that was reference tor 1 in the convention which was expressed in reform but nevertheless remained the convention after that event. Proceed receive under the heading of constitutional principle, there has to be an element of legal , and if you take the example that was cited in the unison case, one could clearly identify that the legal right of access to justice, and therefore rely upon that in order to determine the declaration of a right and the enforcement
My lady, my lords. The issue was not justifiable because it was political. It was political for two reasons. Reasons. One was that it trespassed on the proper province of the executives, and the other was the lack of judicial or standards. By which it could be determined. I paraphrase of course from the opinion of the assumption and hobbs and another case. Much reference has been made to constitutional principle. Constitutional principle may embracebr legal rules but it may also embrace convention. Convention that is not amenable to enforcement in a court of law. And an example of that was seen in miller one in reference to the convention which was expressed in statute four but nevertheless, remained the convention. In order to proceed under the heading of constitutional principle, there has to be an element of legal content, and if you take the example that was cited by my learned friend, the unison case, there went could clearly identify that the legal right of access to justice and,
Undersecretary for labor affairs. Minister ime british Prime Minister Boris Johnsons decision to suspend parliament is being challenged. Gina miller says the Prime Minister went beyond his authority or suspending parliament until mid october, two weeks before the u. K. Is scheduled to leave the eu. Attorneys in the case presented closing statements to the u. K. Supreme court in the case miller versus the Prime Minister. Milady, milord. Issue was nonjustifiable because of what was political. It was political for two reasons. One was that it trespassed on the proper province of the executive and the other was the lack of judicial or manageable standard. Be charm. T could i paraphrase, of course, from case. Inion in another much reference has been made to constitutional principle. Constitutional principle may embrace legal rules, but it may also embrace convention. Convention that is not amenable to enforcement in a court of law , and an example of that was reference tor 1 in the conventi
What you are saying but others will say all of this is such a great area because of our unwritten constitution. We dont know exactly where we do stand and its a question of balance of powers between parliament and the government and the courts, but it shouldnt be this unpredictable in a sense. I agree it shouldnt be unpredictable and it wasnt unpredictable. The law does not permit judicial unpredictable. The law does not permitjudicial review of the prerogative to Prorogue Parliament. It is subject to political control. That leaves space for a serious political controversy, a disagreement between mps and the Prime Minister and eventually there has two. We will have to leave it there because we are back inside the Supreme Court. Lets listen to the governments representative here. Supreme court. Lets listen to the governments representative herelj paraphrase of course from the opinion of hodge in the case of her goal. Mark reference has been made to constitutional principle. Constitution
Efficient to give responsibility or congressional districting to political actors. They consciously chose to give the primary authority to state legislatures and then to police the possibility that state legislatures which the framers knew to be partisan institutions would engage in too much partisanship. They chose to Structural Solutions by giving authority. Decided the one person, one vote concept, we were pretty much saying certain acts by the legislature are unconstitutional, including race discrimination and others. Be that simply because the constitution says that a particular act is in the hands of one branch of government that that deprives the courts of reviewing whether that action is constitutional or not. Questionose the whether that ship has sailed is one way of presenting the question in front of the court today. I would submit you dont have a onesizefitsall solution for disability and i dont think this fits that. I took the central lesson to be the same claim, essential