the material was marked with the highest levels of classification that exists, material that is meant to be held only in secure government facilities not at a private club where basically anyone can pay for membership and wander around. arguably, the agent s most alarming finding that we were able to see in this redacted version was that the boxes contained classified information that came from human intelligence sources meaning if the documents were mishandled, leaked or transmitted they could compromise the identity of american intelligence assets and the affidavit also lays out why doj had good reason not to believe or trust trump and his lawyers knowing that back in february of this year, after the archives notified congress that there was classified material and what they got back from mar-a-lago, trump put out a statement that very fact. investigators write this, quote, there is probable cause to believe that additional documents that contain classified national defense
that you miss what s really important. that s what s happening right now in america. our president and the rest of the democratic party have their priorities all wrong. in a new fox poll, 41% of the potential voters said inflation is their most important concern. with no other issue even coming close. and if you ask joe biden and the democrats, they will tell you inflation is their top priority. and i have said many times tackling inflation is my number one priority. jesse: but actions speak louder than words. instead of lowering prices and pumping more oil, democrats are just ignoring you. just look at what they are focusing on today as the to you jones falls below 30,000 for the first time in a year and a half. after not solving the border crisis and failing to pass voting rights, the white house is now giving kamala yet another task. drum roll, please: kamala harris is going to tackle cyberbullying. it is with that spirit that we are doing the work we are doing today
counterintelligence question about him, frank. wouldn t it be interesting what a great point. wouldn t it be interesting that what started this all off and his troubles becomes the end of him because it s a counterintelligence problem and it s of his own doing. it s of his own doing. that would really be the height of irony here, and i really get concerned about the national security implications. i know i m beating this horse, but think about even phone calls. think about his lawyers who are not cleared to see this, who probably saw it. who probably didn t say oh, no, no, no. they probably peaked at it. think of who he showed just to say hey, look at this, a satellite photo or whatever he s got in there. look at this. it scarce the hell out of me. did he pick up the phone and have a conversation with lawyers and say what about the t.s. document that involves north korea. what about that one? someone intercepted that phone call. someone abroad, a foreign
against the president squarely fits a very popular, very highly used federal corruption statute that basically says this if you re a public official and you re seeking something of value in return for a promise of an official act by you, you ve violated the law. so, the thing of value would be seeking an investigation of your political opponent, biden or his son. the public the official act you could hand them in return for that personal favor would be $250 million in military aid. it doesn t have to be a direct cited quid pro quo. it could be inferred. it could be implied by trump and inferred by the ukrainian. so that s a criminal problem that the president s facing. now let s look at the general counterintelligence problem. when you seek that kind of personal favor from a foreign leader, you are essentially
intelligence, what alarm bells go off? two of them. i want the big question we re missing is obviously why? why did he do this? what did he expect in exchange? what did he expect the ukrainians to do with the information? did they expect access to him while that is manafort while he was influencing policy on the campaign? that s a counterintelligence problem. the second and that s why manafort s cooperation is significant. he s cooperating, i suspect on money issues because he doesn t see those as sensitive as admitting that he was a pawn of a foreign intelligence service. the second question i d have is did that data he provided, was that then used for example, to influence how the russians baht or russian-backed entities bought facebook ads during the campaign. i want to know the why. why he was doing this? because i presume he s not saigt round his townhouse saying hey, they might be interested in this i think i ll turn it over to