them absolutely. and e. jean carroll s counse will emphasize that in their trial strategy but they are not taking an chances. they re also calling an expert witness to educate the jury on some of the reasons wh survivors of rape often don immediately go public with the story. e. jean carroll has, i think been very eloquent i explaining why she didn t come forward immediately. she described herself as havin been raised in a grin and bear it kind of culture, and that personality of being upbeat an using humor to get through things that are difficult is really a through line for a lo of her story i think that if her attorney leans into letting gene carols upbeat, a very individual humo driven personality emerged during the trial, i don t thin it is going to be hard for the jury to understand that this was someone who chose to put a awful experience behind her an
motivated. there is no evidence the investigation is politically motivated. after the agreement for former prosecutor mark pomerantz testify was announced, alvin bragg said this on twitter. our successful stay of thi subpoena blocked the immediate deposition and fortress th time necessary to coordinate with the house judiciary committee on an agreement that protects the d. a. s privilege and interests. we are pleased with this resolution, which ensures an questioning of our forme employee will take place in th presence of our general counse on a reasonable agreed upo timeline let s bring back kate benner and former alabama senator dou jones. katie, what do you make of thi deal between alvin bragg and jordan on having mark pomerant testify? it seems each side here ha claimed a little bit of victory, what do you think of it? well each side has claime victory because no ultimat decision has been made what is interesting as you see first of, all looking at jim jordan he has done somethin
allies claim is politicall motivated. there is no evidence the investigation is politically motivated. after the agreement for former prosecutor mark pomerantz testify was announced, alvin bragg said this on twitter. our successful stay of thi subpoena blocked the immediate deposition and fortress th time necessary to coordinate with the house judiciary committee on an agreement that protects the d.a. s privileges and interests. we are pleased with this resolution, which ensures an questioning of our forme employee will take place in th presence of our general counse on a reasonable agreed upo timeline let s bring back kate benner and former alabama senator dou jones. katie, what do you make of thi deal between alvin bragg and jordan on having mark pomerant testify? it seems each side here ha claimed a little bit of victory, what do you think of it? well each side has claime victory because no ultimat decision has been made what is interesting as you see first of, all looking at jim
exercises. obviously we are speculating you know, the first thing is w don t know where the vote wa here on the injunction we know that two justices made their votes public it is possible that there coul be another justice who did not put their name down as someone who had dissented from the grant of the injunction. but in reality, i think th dobbs opinion was baked in fro the minute donald trump go three supreme court justices o the court during his a tenur as president that was the goal. that was the stated goal it was explicit. and the justices who testified before the senate in their confirmation hearings, the danced all around the issue of whether or not they woul enforce precedent. leaving themselves sufficien with room for the dobb decision - reversed almost 50 years o abortion rights for american women. mini, given the good counse she is, joyce has put a little pinprick in my balloon there so i will ask you. why do you think this outcom was different?
this was improper, and i believe his general counse said, correctly, that would be considered prior restraint if you try to preven publishing a book, then yo might know lose that so he did vocally say, thi book was done without hi permission, of course mall mar pomerantz to, say i didn t nee your permission. so it is really this book ha caused a lot of problems, as dea bragg has thought that i would, and now it has. and now it s been effectively weaponized so from your point of view, how valuable is pomerantz testimony, both in terms of th offense, in terms of prosecuting trump, and a defense of house republicans would like to presumably him out for donald trump well devalue, quite frankly as many people did not rea this book. i read the book, many people didn t so, now there will be public hearings, he will spot what he put in the book. now, that will become public and people who didn t read the book, i will now hear it