child labor the regulatory environmen around child labor loosey-goosey, but when it comes to women, making decisions about their own body overall down the gates very strict side note, i did not know you worked at the bronx zoo. first job, i was a cashie in the wild asia section i was pretty good, if i do say so myself. moved a lot of soda myself that s got huge where you are now. thank you my friend and thanks to all of you a home for joining us this hour. yesterday, when the news broke that fox had reached a last-minute settlement wit dominion, over the network s false claims about the 202 election, there is surprise an there is disappointment. damage. i want to trial. i want it. i guess it s satisfying for dominion that rebar to por over - what we need is fox news personalities to look into the camera and admit that they lie over and over again about th 2020 election. america did not get to watc rupert murdoch raise his right hand and swear to tell the t
yesterday, when the new broke that fox had reached a last-minute settlement wit dominion over the networks false claims about the 202 election, there were surpris and there was disappointment damaged i want my trial. i want it. i guess it s satisfying, i mean, for dominion, that rupert ha to file over a bunch of cash but that does nothing for democracy. what we need is fox news personality to look straight into the camera, admit tha they lied over and over agai about the 2020 election. america did not get to wish rupert murdoch - ruppy raise his right hand and tel the truth, the truth and nothing but the whole truth. they did not get any mea culpa under oath with the country did get to se is a 787.5 million dolla concession from fox, a nearl 788 million dollar payout that suggests fox was scared of wha awaited the company at trial, price tag beginning if that it verges on something a lot of people have been searching for for a long time. that s accountability. and i
varied critical of the a brag, and the decision to try to prevent mr. pomerantz from testifying in fact she even said, there i a book, and the d.a. s office, did write a letter to hi publisher, and ask them not to do it, but they never sued they never took any othe action, and the judge wa careful of that. they had an opportunity to prevent book from bein published, which actuall would ve probably lost, becaus that would be prior restraint. but they didn t take tha opportunity, according to this decision by the judge. it sounds like the fact tha mr. pomerantz went public by the, book was so much of his experience in the d.a. s office it really complicates all this effort, right? why don t you think d.a. bragg why didn t he amounts stronger sort of offense, in terms of at least speed on the record saying, this book is on authorized, we do not want t publish. well, he wrote a letter t simon and schuster, where th publishers he had the association for prosecuting attorneys issue an et
quash a subpoena in fact, she said that this wa a lawsuit dressed up, really - it s really a motion to quas the subpoena, and it s not a lawsuit. she also critique mr. bags lawyers for not following cour procedure. she took about 18 excerpts fro mark pomerantz s book, excerpt that shows that he critique th hush money investigation the one that is now been indicted in fact, he even quotes, and this is according to mr. pomerantz. he quotes mr. bragg same, that he can t say oh for testimony. and michael cohen, it s o course a star witness of the d.a. s office. so the judge put thos excerpts in the decision she also said the first 35 pages of the complaint, was public relations tirade, against former president trump so, she put a lot into the decision, the judge, that wa
trump. and that is accountability with a capital a joining us now is catherin christian, a former specia assistant d a in the manhattan d. a. s office catherine, thanks so much fo being here my pleasure so, first let s talk abou what s happening with th testimony, the subpoena of mar pomerantz. well, chairman jordan had a big victory today. it s been appealed the judge wrote a very biting, 25-page decision denying, d. a. bragg s motio to quash a subpoena. in fact, she said that this wa a lawsuit dressed up, really - it s really a motion to quas the subpoena, and it s not a lawsuit. she also critique mr. bags bragg s lawyers for no following court procedure. she took about 18 excerpts fro mark pomerantz s book, excerpt that shows that he critique th hush money investigation the one that is now been indicted in fact, he even quotes, and