We go to the intersection with architects. And look at different poles to t blocking windows . Is it in front of windows . Is there a tree blocking the si . Here we looked at this is the fe we looked at. We thought it was the best locat that intersection because the aa would be above where the windown adjacent property. That building is about 22 feet m the rightofway. While the other poles on that sn the immediate area are closer to buildings. If you go, i think west, the stt starts to go down in elevation. Sow would lose some signal goint because of that. So that was kind of the reasonid this pole selection. What about placing it on buis instead of poles . Its tough with the zoning in francisco. That is preference seven, the Pg Department can go to that. Its hard at the get these on residential lots. Residentialzoned properties, id say weve heard in past, residel properties could provide an alte to placing them on the pole if Comparable Service if the ses acceptable. We hear more of t
Today here again that they agreed with the revised plan, so the president , your motion would be to deny the plan, issue the variance on the condition that it be can he rised to correct the plans and adopt the findings and would that be sufficient to address yes, it does. Okay. So that is the motion, then. On that motion, commissioner lazarus. Aye. President honda. Aye. Commissioner aye. And commissioner swig. No. The next item is item 8, item 7 has been continued. Item 8 is peal number 17151. Cheryl coan with Building Department approval. The property is at 76640th avenue, protesting the issuance on august 18, 2017 to carren bentley and Kristina Svensson of an alteration permit, a rooms down addition to existing residence, no new Square Footage added, all work is within existing building footprint, includes new family room, full bath, hallway, new doors and windows. Neck deck and stair in rear yard. Im a single mom. I sincerely want to thank this board and particularly the city of San
Have commissioners. To my left is brad russe. Hes a Department City attorney and hell provide any legal assistance. Im cynthia goldstein, the boreds executive director. Were also joined by representatives from the city departments that have cases before the boards tonight. Sitting at the table is cory teagu e and amanda shaw and russ higgins. The board requests that you turnoff or silence all phones and Electronic Devices so that they wont disturb the proceedings and you carrie on conversations in the hallway. Participants are each given seven minutes to present their case and three minutes to present their rebuttal. Members of the public who are not affiliated with the parties have up to three minutes each to address the board and no rebuttal. Please speak into the microphone. To assist the board identify you, you are asked to submit a card to the board before you speak, we also have Customer Service survey forms on the podium, and we welcome your comments and suggestions. If you have
It was designed specifically do that whereas other poles around corner are lower and would not provide the necessary propagation. Kevin, i dont know if you can answer that. Basically im kevin moda swrks verizon. Verizon r. F. Engineer says i need a site at this intersection. We go to the intersection with architects. And look at different poles to see is it blocking windows . Is it in front of windows . Is there a tree blocking the site . Here we looked at this is the first pole we looked at. We thought it was the best location at that intersection because the antenna would be above where the windows were on adjacent property. That building is about 22 feet away from the rightofway. While the other poles on that street in the immediate area are closer to buildings. If you go, i think west, the street starts to go down in elevation. Sow would lose some signal going west because of that. So that was kind of the reasoning behind this pole selection. What about placing it on buildings inst
Oh can i ask the Vice President to consider the draft finding that are attached . We do need to make the five findings, and the appellant has submitted those for us, and also revised plans that reflect the za project. I thought the Zoning Administrator supported this project . The za initially denied a different project. Theyve submitted a revised project, and the 150e a said in the last hearing, and i think today here again that they agreed with the revised plan, so the president , your motion would be to deny the plan, issue the variance on the condition that it be can he rised to correct the plans and adopt the findings and would that be sufficient to address yes, it does. Okay. So that is the motion, then. On that motion, commissioner lazarus. Aye. President honda. Aye. Commissioner aye. And commissioner swig. No. The next item is item 8, item 7 has been continued. Item 8 is peal number 17151. Cheryl coan with Building Department approval. The property is at 76640th avenue, protest