Me the opportunity to teach as an adjunct professor for one year cementing my love for teaching and helping my teacher to further gradual work. It is no exaggeration to say i would not be a thriving phd student without the guidance and friendship of the brilliant and compassionate doctor farhat hawk. [applause] good morning. Thank you for that wonderful introduction. It is students like you that make our life worthwhile really. And so really excited to see that i have mostly students here. You are my kind of people. So what i am hoping their news to sort to sort of conduct this in a little bit more informal way, this, this presentation. So let me say a couple of things 1st. I just came back from pakistan a couple days ago. This is i am still getting over my jet lag. If you see me completely losing it, thats because im still recovering from jet lag. The 2nd thing i wanted to say was about professor Tobias Gipson who was instrumental in getting me invited. We are still really a little up
Country. Guest i agree. Look at thesting to different outcomes. The decisions were pro defendant. And, of the search and seizure berger and william rehnquist, they favor the libertyt the cost of , personal and individual. Host we have more cases and we produced a book that is available to you and outlines the cases. It is available on the website. Theng the next few months, this series will reair and you can watch this on television. This will archive on the website. Will hitilable and we it to you quickly. We have a few minutes left. We will take a few calls. Next is pete. Thank you for this. I enjoy this and try to catch it whenever. About the Fourth Amendment jurisprudence and the exclusionary rule being considered with a lot of exceptions. What do you think about the warrant preference Going Forward . There is that tension in the Fourth Amendment with a preference for the warrant and a ness requirement. Guest you see a orange reference construction warrant preference construction.