originally submitted to us by a coalition of neighborhood association and some members of labor as well. this came to us after several months of discussion that had been ongoing based on a legislation that supervisor wiener introduced back in december. the kind of controversial aspect of see i can t, there are perspectives in terms of what would be the best way to reform it. everyone in the room agrees that reform must happen. the improvements are indeed necessary. the existing process is neither transparent nor predictable and limited project notices continue to sub surprise san francisco residents who learn about projects months after it s been approved. an open-ended appeal window also continues to expose developers to its unpredictable level of risk. over the past decade, [speaker not understood] handful of supervisors attempted to reform san francisco s c-e-q-a process without success including former supervisors peskin, ma, and alioto-pier. again, i think our board is e