Mr Puljich on Friday said GemLife would let the matter be decided next Thursday at council s ordinary meeting. It was despite Monday s general committee meeting containing a fresh report restating the council s case for refusal. That sparked GemLife to send its own reports about the overall benefits of ambitious project to councillors on Friday. Council s reasons for refusal include the development s conflicts with SEQ Regional Plan and the site not being included in the council s urban growth boundaries. The proposed development is contrary to state planning policy as it will irreversibly impact on good agricultural land, council planning co-ordinator Patrick Murphy said in his report.