Mr Puljich on Friday said GemLife would let the matter be decided next Thursday at council's ordinary meeting.
It was despite Monday's general committee meeting containing a fresh report restating the council's case for refusal.
That sparked GemLife to send its own reports about the overall benefits of ambitious project to councillors on Friday.
Council's reasons for refusal include the development's conflicts with SEQ Regional Plan and the site not being included in the council's urban growth boundaries.
"The proposed development is contrary to state planning policy as it will irreversibly impact on good agricultural land," council planning co-ordinator Patrick Murphy said in his report.