i think there are interesting performances because that thing about playing somebody who s famou5 about playing somebody who s famous and whose mannerisms were always 5lightly strange and there is something very mannered about that. but that s right because that the character she s playing. what the film is doing is, the thing that aaron sorkin doe5. it s taking a political and personal situation and a showbiz situation and putting them all together, let s compre55 everything so in the course of this week, there s a story about her husband being unfaithful, there s a hu5band being unfaithful, there s a problem about whether or not america will turn its back on herfor her communism allegations and whether she has to do. the thing she has made the icon 5he she has to do. the thing she has made the icon she is she has to do. the thing she has made the icon she i5 i5 she has to do. the thing she has made the icon she i5 is going to be good enough to save her career. so, it s a contrivanc
corruption? and once again, proof of the contrivance is in the copying. just 13 hours after giuliani was on this show saying all that about biden, the president himself said this. it doesn t matter what i discussed, but i will say this. somebody ought to look into joe biden s statement because it was disgraceful. the statement being that biden said he held back money from ukraine to get rid of a prosecutor, which this president and his trusty counsel want you to think was personally motivated. now here are the ironies. first of all, the idea that this president now cares about corruption, have you ever heard talk about corruption in any other place or in his own government? more so, they re upset at biden for doing exactly what this president is accused of, and they reject biden s defense, which is that he was acting in the national interest and rooting out corruption, even though it s the same defense giuliani laid out for the president right here last night
contrivance about whether or not president trump put pressure on president zielinski to investigation joe biden. thank you. cnn political analyst errol louis lewis joining us now. is he supposed to be asking those things of foreign leaders? not those kinds of things, christi. it looks like abuse of power if the president you ve got or without o a threat behind it requested a foreign leader to conduct an investigation of one of his political opponents, you ve got a problem right there. there also appears to be a violation of the whistleblower statute, a federal statute that says when a whistleblower as in this case says something
believe, really believe that biden is corrupt and, remember, that s why he gets hot. that s why he insists we won t cover it because he s trying to convey to you how deeply convicted he is about this. if you believe that, then you will believe that the president had a legit purpose in pressuring ukraine to investigate biden, that it wasn t about political advantage and self-interest. so even holding back money from ukraine if they don t investigate biden is okay. because why would you give money to a country that won t root out corruption? once again, proof of the contrivance is in the copy. just 13 hours after giuliani was on the show saying all of that about biden, the president himself said this. it doesn t matter what i discussed, but i will say this, somebody ought to look into joe biden s statement because it was disgraceful. statement being biden held
prosecutors write a letter it s a contrivance they put together a letter and manufactured it sane if they had been prosecutors still and the president was not the president they would have charged them with obstruction. this is very odd, i think, because if trump was not president this would not be an issue at all to begin with, right? right. mark: secondly, people think that a lot of former federal prosecutors and there s about 350 federal prosecutors in the southern district of new york alone and were talking federal former prosecutors there must be thousands and thousands. tens of thousands. mark: they put this letter together and everyone s excited about it and i read the letter and there s not a whit of information or substance that makes a difference. robert mueller puts together this report and here we are focused on volume two because volume one that the there s no collusion and there s no