Situation with the penthouse in view of a number of homes in and about it is visible more than the inadequately modifications to a project but i again, i defer to the board on its determination about that athletic qualities but want to emphasis the hostage and truthfulness that jeff and i have put forward that was discovered on the sight permit we realized there was some movements 6 to 8 feet and that was a modification made in the addenda not typical in that public fashion i wanted to finish as well i dont feel terribly comfortable talking about the limits of the boards jurisdiction and im not going to arrest ill defer to the City Attorney on this this is a project that has been accomplished and invested under state law a valid Building Permit and significant signatures into the building including the payment for the slate and construction and expenditures have been made this i dont want to august that ill leave that for the attorney and questions. The 8 feet you referenced was your a
Of suspension on the basis that the da record becau erred. It comes from the release of suspense itself it says if the release is done in part because the project is constructed in substantial to the approved plan you could say the error the board can find not in substantial conformity. That make sense. Thats my motion. Okay. The motion by the president to grant appeal and overturn the release of suspension that the Zoning Administrator erred because the building is not been constructed with the approved plan on that motion you commissioner fung. Commissioner Vice President honda. Commissioner wilson and commissioner swig okay that motion carries and the release of suspension is over turned and blocked commissioner president lazarus no madam clerk, any other business before this committee . Were the commission will please come to order at secretary will call roll commissioner taylormcghee commissioner chow commissioner chung commissioner sanchez and commissioner walker second item it d
Please call the next item the nextordser of business is item 10, closed session. There is none. The next order of business is adjournment. Madam chair. The meeting is adjourned at 414. In memory of rosario [inaudible] thank you. Come to order and the skeet will call roll commissioner pating commissioner king commissioner chow commissioner chung commissioner sanchez commissioner karshmer the second is the approval of the minutes of august 4, 2015. Before you guess for approval a motion is in order. So moved. Are there corrections to the minutes. I think the only typo on item 10 it is obviously sf dph. My apologies thats the only one i found or saw sorry my other comments if not then the minutes are before you for approval all in favor, say i. I. Nancy pelosis the minutes are approved directors report. Good afternoon, commissioners sitting in for director garcia on a well deserved vacation hair directors report the first is to talk about the first cohort of interns on august 3rd dpw Huma
And talk with the commission hopefully the board and everyone and flush out those options. Sorry we were distrusting the first meeting in september after the august break. This is exceptional for me as long as question have solutions. As the chair the committee im also very open to schedule this hearing whenever the appropriate time is my district is pressed with cayuga and the most impacted areas i have a ton of interest topic mike maybe national set a particular date if we can do that earlier id like to do that earlier than later have a motion to continue to the call of the chair and work with the colleagues and puc to schedule this as soon as the information is available and well collectively put pressure on the puc to make sure that is done as quickly as possible perhaps the motion should be there should be a hearing or continue the hearing no matter september. Yeah. Unfortunately supervisor yee the dates hesitate to be continued to a date certain. Colleagues, we all have so many i
Giving testimony today please stand and raise your hand right. Do you swear that the testimony youre going to give is the truth to the best of your knowledge. Thank you. You may be seated. Okay. The next item is c, approval of minutes. Discussion and possible action to adopt the minutes for november 16, 2016. Is there a motion to approve . Move to approve. Is there a second . Second. Okay. Is there Public Comment on this item . Okay. Seeing none are all commissioners in favor . Aye. Any opposed . Okay. The minutes are approved and for the record commissioner lee is present as well. Okay. We are on to item d continued appeals or abatement. Case on bush street owner of record bush street apartment street 100 street San Francisco california. Applicant and action requested by appellant and says it doesnt exist in code and seeks modification or reversal of abatement and this is for information everyone present, the department has seven minutes to present the case. The appellate aptd has sev