The board of supervisors approved that, i signed it into law. Jeffrey heller, the city and county of San Francisco oh, and and your band of architects a great thing, just a great thing. To impart to the history of this building is remarkable. To see a person who comes in with a gloomy look on their face , and all of a sudden you Start Talking about this building, the gloomy look disappears and a smile registers across their face. With children, and i do mainly all of the childrens tours, that is a totally different feeling because you are imparting knowledge that they have no idea where it came from, how it was developed, and you can Start Talking about how things were before we had computer screens, cell phones, lake in 1915, the mayor of San Francisco used to answer the telephone and he would say, good morning, this is the mayor. At times, my clothes make me feel powerful. Powerful in a different sense. I am not the biggest person in the world, so therefore, i have to have something
Existing home or building in San Francisco. It doesnt affect buildings remodels or retrofits. This is only for negate construction permits applied for next year or later. So you will still be able to use your gas range, and so will all of your favorite restaurants. Chair peskin i thought you were done. I apologize. Supervisor mandelman i did say that i was concluding, but i still have a couple more paragraphs. I will conclude shortly. The proposal was developed through a broad stakeholder process that began in earnest back in january, and thats why my office has worked closely with city staff. In addition, i will also be offering amendments that include a reporting requirement on the issue of mixed fuel reporting requirements to be reported to d. B. I. To be sure were tracking effectiveness of the all electric requirement. There has been significant support from Many Organizations as well as from dozens of design, technology, and construction professionals and organizations, including
Market make his gas station whatever it may need to be in the future. There is also been both between the tenant and the city, you know, what else can we do with this site . Certain other departments, the department of environment is interested in putting charging stations there. So all of these issues would take time, would take review. We cant do that in, you know, 68 months. So this would allow this lease and the term of it would allow all these things to be taken into consideration and try to Work Together as partners to move with the technology and whatever happens in the future. We did get an appraisal even though we werent required to under the code so we could come to a Fair Market Rent. It does substantially increase the rent. I believe it was 9,000 a month, now it will be approximately 16,000 a month. The percentage adjustment per year remains the same, 3 . The tenant pays all of the utilities and all permits and taxes. So there is no real downside in the sense that the tenan
Chair peskin welcome to the land use and Transportation Committee today, september 21, 2020. I am chair aaron peskin, joined by supervisor ahsha safai and supervisor dean preston. Our clerk is miss erica major. Miss major, could you please make any announcements. Clerk yes. Due to the covid19 pandemic, city hall and board rooms are closed. Committee members will attend through Video Conference and participate in the meeting to the same extent as if they are physically present. Public comment will be available on each item of this agenda. Depending on your provider, you can watch the meeting on cable channels 26, 78, or 99 or sfgov. Org is streami sfgovtv streaming the number across the stream. The number is 4156550001. The meeting i. D. Is 1462832975. Press pound, and pound again. When connected, you will hear the meeting discussions, but you will be muted and in listening mode only. When your item of interest comes up, please press star, three to be added to the speaker line. Best pra
I dont know the definitive answer. I think n that yes, you are correct. We need to check that and get back to you. Right, my concern is, given everything we know in the short term, i would hate for San Mateo County to act because of that imperative. And then i guess the question is, is it possible, i guess you cant really pass we vote to pass both. That sounds bizarre. Not to say that you want to change your vote and but it there a way for the City Attorney to pass both measures . We prefer no government structure but if there were government structure positions, we support them. We couldnt do Something Like that. I understand this is very unorthodox. As of our meeting right now, and if they vote the Santa Clara County board of supervisors. That impasse is what will prevent the measure from appearing on the ballot. It wont be the action we take no matter what action we take. Because thats what you might call a preexisting condition. And as i said, i had any number of conversations with