On, he is surrounded by criminals. Then we hear well, it cant be obstruction of congress, you could have all gone to court. We are in december. We have an ongoing crime. We have a crime in progress. Neil youre watching history being made. Welcome everyone i am neil cavuto and this is your world. The committee is debating the articles of impeachment and will soon put it to a vote within the house Judiciary Committee. On the lower right portion of your screen, the dell racing ahead close to a record. The s p 500 got a record. Twin develop menswear following very quickly. Reports that the administration is very close on the verge of just about at a deal in principle with china. A china trade deal. A phase one deal that it will call for eliminating or at least pushing Back Hundreds of billions of Dollars Worth of tariffs on chinese goods. Including those that were supposed to kick in on about 156 billion worth of chinese goods on the 15th of this month. 12 01 on Sunday Morning Prayer that
그들만의 물징계 … 뇌물·성추행 걸려도 법복 벗으면 끝 [탐사기획-법관징계 리포트]
segye.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from segye.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
임성근 탄핵 가능했던 이유
etoday.co.kr - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from etoday.co.kr Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
enough. abuse of power by the highest position in the land, the leader of the free world, that abuse of power is not enough to impeach. the framers were so desperate lee concerned they were terrified of the font of an unprincipled man, a person finding his way into the white house. this is just that abuse of power is not serious is not enough is simply ridiculous. the president has a constitutional duty and that is the highest documented in the land, the violate the constitution. you have a constitution duty to
not done. you re saying the constitution is obsolete. the constitution grants the senate the power to do these confirmations to advise and consent and do vetting. > which they are not doing. you re saying that the constitution is obsolete and we have to go extra constitutional because you don t like this nominee? i have not said that in any sense. i said they have failed their constitution duty. how? we haven t had the hearing yet. we re having a hearing on thursday. they ve already scheduled a vote. they have somehow already scheduled a vote. why wouldn t they. they re not calling relevant witnesses like mark judge. if you re going to say it s political, margaret made the point, both sides have issues with this. but you cannot say that republicans meaning lawmakers in washington have been on the up and up about all of this. just as you re saying and i think everyone agrees with you, we have the presumption of innocence first. but also they don t believe this woman at all