not done. >> you're saying the constitution is obsolete. the constitution grants the senate the power to do these confirmations to advise and consent and do vetting. > which they are not doing. >> you're saying that the constitution is obsolete and we have to go extra constitutional because you don't like this nominee? >> i have not said that in any sense. i said they have failed their constitution duty. >> how? we haven't had the hearing yet. we're having a hearing on thursday. >> they've already scheduled a vote. they have somehow already scheduled a vote. >> why wouldn't they. >> they're not calling relevant witnesses like mark judge. if you're going to say it's political, margaret made the point, both sides have issues with this. but you cannot say that republicans meaning lawmakers in washington have been on the up and up about all of this. just as you're saying and i think everyone agrees with you, we have the presumption of innocence first. but also they don't believe this woman at all. what is her presumption?
Related Keywords
Power , Senate , Consent , Constitution , Confirmations , Vetting , Hearing , Vote , Sense , We Haven T , Nominee , Constitution Duty , Republicans , Point , Margaret Hoover , Issues , Witnesses , Mark Judge , Sides , Wouldn T , Lawmakers , Wall , Presumption , Everyone , Woman , Presumption Of Innocence First , Washington ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.