Phone call. They have testified that they raised concerns about the president s conduct. Do you share any of those concerns . Do you think anything you have seen or heard so far is alarming . Or inappropriate . The question is whether we deserve to have the president removed from office. When i went to the transcript, i was not happy. I probably would have done it differently. But no one said there is a crime. I dont think it rises to the level of taking a president out of office. Of does it rise to the level what nancy pelosi said earlier this year, which is she would withove forward impeachment unless it was bipartisan. One of the great tragedies of this process we are being dragged through is it is highly partisan. It was not that way under clinton or nixon. The minority had certain rights. The president had certain rights. They set up a very partisan process which has done in the country a great disservice. President s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, travel to root ukraine to con
Stereotypes about how men and women should behave. It discriminates against her the same way as Price Waterhouse discriminated against and hopkins for failing to walk and talk more feminine league. And hopkins that would lose her case on the same facts. Second, harris fired her for identifying as a woman only because she was assigned male sex at birth. In doing so they fired her for contravening a sex specific expectation that applies only to people assigned male sex at birth. They live and identify as a man for their entire lives. Is mistreatment on the basis of sex. Harris fired her for changing her sex, that is discrimination the same way firing someone for changing their religion would be religious dissemination. Harris would fire transgender men for being insufficiently feminine and transgender women for being insufficiently mass killing is as the government conceives none of these arguments ask the court to redefine or update sex. Minimum sex a assigned at birth based on physical
First, firing her for failing to conform to explicitly stated stereotypes about how men and women should behave. It discriminated against her in the same way as Price Waterhouse discriminated against anne h opkins for failing to walk and talk more feminine. Pkinsnnot be that anne ho would lose her case on the same facts. Second, harris fired her for identifying as a woman only because she was assigned male sex at birth. In doing so, they fired her for contravening a sex specific expectation that applies only to people assigned male sex at birth. Namely, that they live and identify as amen for their entire lives. That is disparate treatment on the basis of sex. Herd, harris homes fired for, changing her sex. That is discrimination in the same way firing someone for changing their religion would be religious discrimination. That harris homes would fire transgender men for being insufficiently feminine and transgender women for being insufficiently masculine, is as the government concedes
She was a valuable employee until she told her boss she when harris responded by firing her, he discriminated against her because of her sex for three reasons. First, firing her for failing to conform to explicitly stated stereotypes about how men and women should behave. It discriminates against her the same way as Price Waterhouse discriminated against and hopkins for failing to walk and talk more feminine league. And hopkins that would lose her case on the same facts. Second, harris fired her for identifying as a woman only because she was assigned male sex at birth. In doing so they fired her for contravening a sex specific expectation that applies only to people assigned male sex at birth. They live and identify as a man for their entire lives. Is mistreatment on the basis of sex. Harris fired her for changing her sex, that is discrimination the same way firing someone for changing their religion would be religious dissemination. Harris would fire transgender men for being insuffi
She was a valuable employee until she told her boss she would identify she was a valuable employee until she told her boss she would identify when harris responded by firing her, he discriminated against her because of her sex for three reasons. First, firing her for failing to conform to explicitly stated stereotypes about how men and women should behave. It discriminates against her the same way as Price Waterhouse discriminated against and hopkins for failing to walk and talk more femininely. It cannot be that and hopkins would lose her case on the same facts. Second, harris fired her for identifying as a woman only because she was assigned male sex at birth. In doing so they fired her for contravening a sex specific expectation that applies only to people assigned male sex at birth. They live and identify as a man for their entire lives. That is mistreatment on the basis of sex. Harris fired her for changing her sex, that is discrimination the same way firing someone for changing t