well, i mean, the answer kristen holmes at the white house what have you learned? reporter: ana, this letter is the question sort of answers coming a day after bolton did itself. doesn t it? not show up for his deposition there are sometimes vald reaso s from his attorneys to these house committees. i ll read you a part of it and s, to keep advice to a president we ll get to what it means. confidential. in the letter, ambassador bolton as we learned in the clinton investigation and in the nixon national security adviser to the president and personally investigation, that involved in many of the events, confidentiality requirement meetings and conversations about evaporates when what s under which you have already received investigation is quite literally testimony as well as many criminal or impeachable conduct. relevant meetings and conversations that have not yet been discussed in testimony so one person who did testify, gordon sondland. his name comes up a lot in the far. ob
reporter: tonight apple is defending siri and its popular voice assistant on iphone, ipad, and apple watch faces new criticism. an anonymous whistle blower told the an anonymous whistle blower told the guardian newspaper that human contractors can sometimes listen to what siri hears. among the chatter, confidential medical conversations, drug deals, and even intimate moments according to the whistle blower. confirmed the story, but apple did not deny the allegation, telling us it uses the recordings to make nbc news has not confirmed the story, but apple did not deny the allegation, telling us it uses the recordings to make siri work better, adding only a very small random subset, less than 1% of daily siri utterances, are used to improve siri and dictation. but with 15 billion siri commands made every month, ten of millions could be listened tong siri recordings are apple responded saying siri recordings are not attached to your apple user name or other identifying information, a
no cooperation and there s no accountability in the va from their point of view. so what they re saying is, they do what they can, but the va s not really responsive to them. you re saying essentially that they re reporting at least from veterans who have spoken to you, is that they feel the responsiveness was wholly on the part of the va and not from their member of congress, or do they have complaints about the response from their representatives? there are quite a few of veterans who are very upset with their members of congress. it s hard for us to penetrate that, because constituency records and constituency communications with members of congress are not public records. i ve asked to interview senator mccain s department of veterans affairs. and i ve been turned down. so they will also talk about the members of congress, saying there s a confidentiality requirement that they have, so they re not going to discuss particular cases. yeah. and in addition to being the senior se