means before day ten. i have no knowledge as to whether this occurred in this case or not. this confirms that there were indeed communications issues between horizon and the data centre at this time. however, it should have had no impact on data recorded locally within the branch, provided all operational processes are followed correctly. all historical data should have been sent back to the branch from the data centre as normal. i have not had the opportunity to examine the detailed logs from the period to see whether there were any issues or any justification in the claim that this resulted in a apparent system losses of £3000, as claimed. those final words in that final sentence, i have not had the opportunity to examine the detailed logs, do you consider that to be a fair and accurate summary of the position we have seen in those e mails? it accurate summary of the position we have seen in those e-mails?- have seen in those e-mails? it looks that wa , have seen in thos
horizon help desk. it says although some ar 0, that is due to order data, was obtained, it was a dip sample and there was no evidence of zero transactions. it was not check for bugs or evidence of that. the prosecution produced a witness statement from mrjenkins explaining the horizon system and producing some arq data. mrjenksjenkins produced three schedules from that data to prove that they were normal occurrences. the next paragraph. they say, these factors are sufficient for the court to quash mr thomas s conviction on both grounds one and two. we were, however, presented with further information which bolsters our conclusion that mr thomas s prosecution should not have been brought, and which forms the basis of the post office s concession underground two. an attendance note, written by a post