Enforcement matter in the european union, based on a theory that goes beyond international rules, well allow you to file a lawsuit here and collect the money back. In fact, you can auction off the embassy of the country that sues you. We could do a lot to make it clear that were tired of this onesided debate in which we demand and they give a live, and we give a little more. Because they are threatening to hurt our industry. Its the wrong approach. We need to get much more tough minded. If i could add to that, i agree with the questioner in the main, but i also agree with stu. In the sense of, there is a whole lot of, oh, im shocked that theres gambling in this establishment going on. And there is certainly some hypocrisy, some double standards, and indeed, a lot of the stuff the nsa is doing is doing in cooperation with some of these governments. I dont think that and, also, and again, ive conceded as much, sometimes this is being used as an excuse to justify positions that were alrea
Selfinterest and they are dressing it up in a Data Protection guys, and the only thing that i have ever discovered that they understand is the threat of retaliation, if they go beyond the legal bounds that they have set. That are set by International Trade law. And the u. S. And the u. S. Congress has been reluctant to stand up for companies and say, if you get hit with a case, an enforcement matter in the european union, based on a theory that goes beyond international rules, well allow you to file a lawsuit here and collect the money back. In fact, you can auction off the embassy of the country that sues you. We could do a lot to make it clear that were tired of this onesided debate in which we demand and they give a live, and we give a little more. Because they are threatening to hurt our industry. Its the wrong approach. We need to get much more tough minded. If i could add to that, i agree with the questioner in the main, but i also agree with stu. In the sense of, there is a whol
Us journal cspan. Org. We want to show you what the speaker of the house had to say yesterday talking to reporters about the options that republicans have on immigration. Host . Host this is a serious breach of constitution, to our system of government. Frankly, we have limited options, limited abilities to deal with it directly. But thats why we are continuing to talk to our members. We have not made decisions about how we are going to proceed. Host speaker of the house speaking about the occasions they have. Joining us is mike willis, a staff writer with the hill newspaper. Mike, what is the plan right now . Caller he said he hasnt decided on anything concrete. The thing they are leaning towards is a twostep process, and it would be two separate bills. The first would address the immigration executive order directly. This is a conservative bill that would basically say it could exempt people from deportation. Host thats a symbolic measure because the senate is controlled by the democ
We have a pretty good way of looking at the relationship between supply and demand. On the supply side you can capture this in a diagram. What it would look like under this budget and what it would look like under sequester. It is not a pretty story when you compare that to the requirements around the globe. I am talking about real requirements for presence and crisis response. It is starting to get ready pretty dicey, that that is why we are saying manageable risk. Im told you have 7. 9 billion for investment, reset and readiness which sounds a lot like putting money on procurement and operations make in its, do you have a criteria in mind when you decide what you will get from that account . Some people think that is pure padding. We would be the first to say that over the course of a decade or so that we havent overseas Contingency Operation funding, too much has crept into that account. We are determined to fix that. It will take time, we cannot do it overnight. It would represent
Or are there other costs as well . We follow the same rules. This is no deviation from that. It. It includes costs from the missions we are doing. As has been the case for many years. Those bases will presumably stay a while. After next year, right now the number of troops is supposed to go down to nothing. But, we are still going to see overseas Contingency Operations until at least 2020 . What you will see in the budget documents released which i have not had a chance to review myself is a proposal that we Work Together in the executive branch and congress to move some of those costs for what takes place in the command region to the budget if circumstances allow us to do so. The department is not able to absorb those costs within a big topline however. If the war ends, why cant that be done quicker the transition . It can be done quickly as a larger budget negotiation allows. But, if sequestration is not lifted, it is not doable to shove all those costs of back into the base budget w