Trump as a practicing lawyer i followed the Supreme Court for many years and became alarmed in recent years reading the cases of the 54 decisions and the 63 decisions which seemed to be decided along partisan line so had the liberal wing of the court, all aopinioned by democratic president s and the conservative wing all appointed by republican president s, and they were taking political positions which could easily be identified with the ideas of the respective parties. Oducti about thing wed care bit. Excerp rights and preproductive rights. Lets look an an exert. You say the courts dramatic porlarization is a recipe for the undermining of our greatest institution and has not been fully appreciated by most otherwise well insured americans. What did you mean by that . Guest theres lessis confidence in the decision and to public at large doesntt accept their decisions and afte, all, the Supreme Court is alexander hamilton, doesnt have an army, doesnt have any money so its power comes fr
Independence, 2027488002. Is d party, that number green party, libertarian party, 2027488003. cspanwj. Tweet and paul from monmouth arsity in new jersey poll from Monmouth University, this one coming on wednesday saying 2016 brought out the worst in people, more than two voters in three voters say the race has brought out the worst in people and they disapprove of the campaigns harsh rhetoric. Dissatisfaction rather than anger is the work to best characterize feelings of voters about the federal government. The results show the opinion on terrorism has not changed much. Even after the recent bombings in new york and new jersey. They say that 70 of American Voters say that this years president ial campaign has brought up a worse in people. One more article on that, Huffington Post this morning, a lot of people are getting into fights over the election is the headline. Just a quick look at that, they say if you have not noticed, this election is divisive. More than one third of americans
Cspan three. The Supreme Court has this amount of power and with that comes greater responsibility that you have individual sitting on the court for 30 or 35 years, it just doesnt pass the smell test when it comes to modern democracy. Sunday night on q a, gay broth talks about changes youd like to see at the Supreme Court. Including opening up oral arguments to the cameras and imposing term limits on the justices. Requiring justices to hear to the same code of ethics that other judges follow. The Supreme Court decisions affect all americans. All americans are aware of the third branch of government and in the last ten or 15 years of that branch has become so powerful. The idea and issues on voting, marriage, healthcare, immigration, womens rights, i could go on and on, issues that may be 20 or 30 years ago congress and the executive branch would figure out a compromise and put together a bill. That doesnt happen anymore. The buck stops with the Supreme Court in a way that is unpreceden
And more between risings costs and stagnant income. Its pri my great pleasure to bring dr. Dynan to the stage. Thank you very much. [applause] thank you. Thank you, christian, for that very gracious introduction, and thanks for inviting me to participate. Im really so glad that cap is digging in on this topic. In the two plus year ive been in the administration i learned things that have really unscoredded for me the importance of higher saving in the retirement context, and in other con texts as well. And ive also learned just how complicated. It is to develop policy options on those fronts. So, i think its great youre digging in. I also will say im glad you assembled such an allteam of experts to participate in this conference, speaking to people who have influence, peoples research. Ive been in Conception Research for years now, and the group you had on the agenda this morning was just a group that is influenced me as well. So id like to thank that group for doing that important pub
Radical impact. On the issue of accountability, do you have legislation . I think they have the ability to do it and they simply arent enforcing it. Jeff does it. I dont question him. Its to get the best care possible. I think it wont have the same effe effect. And ive seen that where you couldnt get rid of a bad teacher. Of c you k bcan, but you have to doe work. They want to get rid of this, and we differ there. I think jeff thinks they need more protection. And what ive told the secretary is that they may need to theres a lot of risk analysis thats done in what they do, is it less expensive to just reach a settlement with this individual than it would be to take them all the way through, let them appeal to the protection board and then they end up back at the va and were paying for their Attorney Fees . I get that. But i think were going to have to take one of the most egregious cases. Even if it gets reversed. The American People would be able to see how difficult it appears to be