Number 5 and if no one comes forward well close the comment so we can do a roll call vote. Commissioner campos. Campos absent commissioner chiu chiu aye. Commissioner farrell . Farrell aye. Commissioner tang. Aye. Wiener aye. It passes. Next item please. Item number 6 except the audit report this is an action item. Colleagues, any comments or questions . Okay seeing no one come forward well close Public Comment and can we take that okay the item passes. Next item please. Item 7. Implementation and licensing and support and Maintenance Services for microsoft dynamics and authorize the executive director to negotiate contract Payment Terms this is an action item. Okay no questions from the colleagues. Public comment is now open on item number 7 and seeing no one come forward well close Public Comment. Same call the item passes. And well go on to items 8. Allocate in prop k funds this is an action item. Great. Commissioner mar. Colleagues this is a request for 3 different projects for pro
And muni and ac transit and the change since that time has been a proposal to change the core capacity formulas to savor some of the smaller operators proposes 30 percent to the big 3 and seventy percent to the other operators. The Regional Transit ridership is about eighty percent carried by the big 3 operators and the balance carried by the other operators so that will continue and hope there will be more time to make that formula more equitable across the region. So were monitoring the transportation california and alliance for jobs proposal for statewide vls and if passed the fifty percent threshold could generate the estimated 25 billion dollars statewide and for San Francisco slightly less about 57 million per year compared to 73 if we were to pass it locally. The active Transportation Program weve reported on in the pass past this is the new program for smaller projects that used to be the transportation enhancement program. Were continuing to advocate for the cpc to administer
And colleagues commissioner wiener. Id like to respond to ms. Hodges comment. Absolutely. We very clearly support the bicycle strategy implementation. Implementation of that plan requires a lot of funding as well as increased project delivery strategies partnerships with the mta and communities really allowing those projects to go in efficiently we can accelerate it with a concerted effort by the community by staff and new ways of doing business to implement these projects to design them faster and get in them in the ground faster and i believe theres no reason why we couldnt keep the pace of that investment but at the moment were deliverying five Million Dollars per year and the new investment levels represents a large multiple of that about 38 Million Dollars per year if we were to do it by 2018 as was discussed at the hearing so this question of how much investment is not a concern i dont believe for us because its really about can we get it done quickly in a timely way and to reall
Ways of doing business to implement these projects to design them faster and get in them in the ground faster and i believe theres no reason why we couldnt keep the pace of that investment but at the moment were deliverying five Million Dollars per year and the new investment levels represents a large multiple of that about 38 Million Dollars per year if we were to do it by 2018 as was discussed at the hearing so this question of how much investment is not a concern i dont believe for us because its really about can we get it done quickly in a timely way and to really discuss how were going to do that neighborhood by neighborhood and corridor by corridor its a whole new paradigm of delivery and Community Involvement in the outreach process to really discuss what were wanting to see on the street how quickly we should be responding between plan and design and construction phases and being more efficient as we do our complete streets resurfacing with our Capital Project and see working w
Other member of the public would like to comment . Okay. Well close Public Comment. And colleagues commissioner wiener. Id like to respond to ms. Hodges comment. Absolutely. We very clearly support the bicycle strategy implementation. Implementation of that plan requires a lot of funding as well as increased project delivery strategies partnerships with the mta and communities really allowing those projects to go in efficiently we can accelerate it with a concerted effort by the community by staff and new ways of doing business to implement these projects to design them faster and get in them in the ground faster and i believe theres no reason why we couldnt keep the pace of that investment but at the moment were deliverying five Million Dollars per year and the new investment levels represents a large multiple of that about 38 Million Dollars per year if we were to do it by 2018 as was discussed at the hearing so this question of how much investment is not a concern i dont believe for