allowing place to have access to this material again would not work those ends. police have access to the material now. they can go out and buy them with their own funding. that takes valuable money out of police budgets but they utilize for other programs like getting summer jobs for kids, who are engaged in criminal activity and try to keep them out of gang activity. boston please have an amazing program where they take ice cream trucks out and engage with kids. why don t we keep those ice cream trucks stocked with a product with the city budget and if we can buy productive vests and helmets from a federal surplus and get offices safe and at the same time continue our community engagement strategy, we have to be careful of mission creep. we don t want to have s.w.a.t. teams executing every search warrant just because they have the equipment. we should be giving a lot more surveillance getting subject to come out of a home, stopped them around the corner, going nice and easily and g
infrastructure to do something like that, it would be useful. now, seth, does it prevent though, on the same level you have someone on the list who did something we could have caught, it s unclear if there were any mistakes made, but if you ve got so many lists coming out of the u.s. government that you become a slave to the list. i m only going to look at the list, then miss somebody that s not on the list. the list can be bad both ways. that s a very good point. i think part of the issue that we have with this case is especially if there were some family members that were aware of radicalization, what is our community engagement strategy like, especially with law enforcement and muslim communities, for example. we ve seen in several cases with a alexandria five in virginia, there were concerned individuals that went to the fbi through nongovernmental organizations and said we ve got a jihadist problem here.
like that, it would be useful. now, seth, does it prevent though, on the same level you have someone on the list who did something we could have caught, it s unclear if there were any mistakes made, but if you ve got so many lists coming out of the u.s. government that you become a slave to the list. i m only going to look at the list, then miss somebody that s not on the list. the list can be bad both ways. that s a very good point. i think part of the issue that we have with this case is especially if there were some family members that were aware of radicalization, what is our community engagement strategy like, especially with law enforcement and muslim communities, for example. we ve seen in several cases with a alexandria five in virginia, there were concerned individuals that went to the fbi through nongovernmental organizations and said we ve got a jihadist
it s unclear if there were any mistakes made, but if you ve got so many lists coming out of the u.s. government that you become a slave to the list. i m only going to look at the list, then miss somebody that s not on the list. the list can be bad both ways. that s a very good point. i think part of the issue that we have with this case is especially if there were some family members that were aware of radicalization, what is our community engagement strategy like, especially with law enforcement and muslim communities, for example. we ve seen in several cases with a alexandria five in virginia, there were concerned individuals that went to the fbi through nongovernmental organizations and said we ve got a jihadist problem here. we ve got kids going to pakistan radicalized. that did not happen here. that s more than just a list. that s also our ability to have some systematic engagement. and a bombing on a train in canada was caught because some people came forward.