Attorney serving the neighborhood ive never seen a third bathroom in any house in the entire neighborhood. There are no threebathroom houses in the bayview district. And certainly it doesnt make sense to have a threebathroom and twobedroom unit for this single mother and her young daughter. It doesnt make sense. Which leaves the only logical conclusion in my mind that the Property Owner is intending to make this two short term rentals. The upstairs bedroom has been siphoned into units. The planning website reflects. The Property Owner told me this isnt planned but i have a hard time seeing any other possible reality that can occur here. No one believes in the maintaining the Affordable Housing more than i do. But in this case this isnt the hypothetical. Somebody is actually living there with her daughter. And this is potentially lowering her ability to live there in the same way that shes lived there for the past many years. Finally im sorry. I lost my train of thought. The unit oh the
About back here about 7 45, please. Thank you we are ready. Okay. Please be seated. Welcome back to the november 6, 2019 meeting of the San Francisco board of appealing. We are now on item number 7. This is appeal number 19085. Our mission no eviction versus the Planning Commission subject property is 344 shortstop 14th street, appealing the issuance to mm stevenson llc of planning code section 329 large project authorization. Adopting findings relating to a large project authorization for the project proposing new construction of a sevenstory, 78 feet at all mixed use residential building measuring 84,630 square feet with 5,890 square feet of ground floor retail use and 606 dwelling units consisting of four studio units, 25 twobedroom, two bathroom units which would utilize the code section 6591565918 and invoke waivers from the Development Standards for rear yard pursuant to section 134 usable open space 135 and height, planning code 268. Record number 2014. 0948. I need to make a di
Unit. It was created into a twobedroom unit. Shes lived in a twobedroom unit the entire time shes lived there. And the coincidences im talking about ive probably been in more homes in the Bayview District than pretty much any other person in San Francisco as a housing attorney serving the neighborhood ive never seen a third bathroom in any house in the entire neighborhood. There are no threebathroom houses in the Bayview District. And certainly it doesnt make sense to have a threebathroom and twobedroom unit for this single mother and her young daughter. It doesnt make sense. Which leaves the only logical conclusion in my mind that the Property Owner is intending to make this two short term rentals. The upstairs bedroom has been siphoned into units. The planning website reflects. The Property Owner told me this isnt planned but i have a hard time seeing any other possible reality that can occur here. No one believes in the maintaining the Affordable Housing more than i do. But in this
Was less risky than digging it up and hauling it to anotr state somewhere. Reporter but theres another issue weighing heavily as well. Money. Its estimated that removing the soil could cost more than 130 million and the developer reportedly considers that a deal breaker. It may cost so much that no developer would show up toundertake it and it would sit there the way it is for another decade. Reporter but it could be worth billions. And the city has asked for a 5 2 Million Dollar Community Benefits payment to help fund city programs and services. The Community Benefit agreement are not, you know, they are not necessarily a pay off for doing something that is less than you know less than desirable. Reporter but those opposing the deal say it feels that way. And once the property is sealed and homes are built, they say the toxic soil will sit there slowly leaching into the bay and ground water. What are we going to do then . What will we do . U how will we correct that problem . So now i
Well determined forms of wages, hours and benefits commonly found in public employment, typically, trying to create a balance between the employers ability to pay and the conditions within the relevant labor markets and the cost of living. So given all that, weve by the numbers, weve probably we counted it up. We had nearly 400 bargaining sessions. We dealt with almost 2,000 proposals from all of the unions taken together, and through the process from the middle of january through may 15, we were able to resolve all outstanding matters either by agreement or in some instances, by award. We had 26 tables. Seven of them were solved by negotiations, and through agreement, the remaining nine m. O. U. S were set by arbitration award. The generalization increases are covered in the controllers report. Roughly, its 11 over a 3year period. The just by way of explanation, the city and the unions did conduct extensive analysis on the cost of living. We compared public and private wage and benefi